PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FLXD.L vs. IMV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) and IMV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - FLXD.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR while IMV.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXD.L returned 13.18%/yr vs 7.54%/yr for IMV.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLXD.L is traded in GBP, while IMV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IMV.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXD.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than IMV.L's 4.72% return.

FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
—

IMV.L

1D
0.51%
1M
1.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
5.90%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF		9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.54%1.48%13.79%-11.21%-3.30%
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS		4.72%17.66%6.63%8.56%-7.83%13.68%1.50%16.37%-2.91%-0.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXD.L and IMV.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017

0.77

The correlation between FLXD.L and IMV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FLXD.L
IMV.L

Financial Services

35.8%
17.9%

Communication Services

16.3%
9.6%

Energy

11.6%
7.1%

Healthcare

10.3%
13.0%

Industrials

7.9%
15.4%

Basic Materials

5.2%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
13.1%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.6%

Utilities

3.1%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
3.6%

Technology

0.7%
2.8%

Financial Services

FLXD.L
35.8%
IMV.L
17.9%

Communication Services

FLXD.L
16.3%
IMV.L
9.6%

Energy

FLXD.L
11.6%
IMV.L
7.1%

Healthcare

FLXD.L
10.3%
IMV.L
13.0%

Industrials

FLXD.L
7.9%
IMV.L
15.4%

Basic Materials

FLXD.L
5.2%
IMV.L
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

FLXD.L
4.6%
IMV.L
13.1%

Real Estate

FLXD.L
3.5%
IMV.L
1.6%

Utilities

FLXD.L
3.1%
IMV.L
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FLXD.L
1.0%
IMV.L
3.6%

Technology

FLXD.L
0.7%
IMV.L
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS

Often compared with FLXD.L:
FLXD.L vs. TDGB.LFLXD.L vs. LDEG.LFLXD.L vs. XSTC.LFLXD.L vs. EQDS.LFLXD.L vs. S7XP.LFLXD.L vs. IDVY.LFLXD.L vs. VUAG.L
Often compared with IMV.L:
IMV.L vs. MIVO.LIMV.L vs. SPYIMV.L vs. MINV.LIMV.L vs. XDEQ.LIMV.L vs. MVUS.LIMV.L vs. UB06.LIMV.L vs. CSWG.L

Return for Risk

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
IMV.L
IMV.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IMV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IMV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FLXD.LIMV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.40
0.91

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.51
1.27

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.17

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

0.97

+4.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

2.92

+12.82

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the IMV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXD.L and IMV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FLXD.LIMV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

0.91

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.69

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.62

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.71

-0.08

Drawdowns

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than IMV.L's maximum drawdown of -24.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXD.L and IMV.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FLXD.LIMV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-24.48%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

-8.50%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-8.50%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

-17.42%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-24.48%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-4.62%

+1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-3.57%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

2.83%

-1.53%

Volatility

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) is 2.67%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS (IMV.L) has a volatility of 2.89%. This indicates that FLXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FLXD.LIMV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

2.89%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

7.71%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

9.13%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

10.97%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.91%

12.31%

+0.60%

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLXD.L and IMV.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLXD.L vs. IMV.L - Dividend Comparison

FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, while IMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF		4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%
IMV.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Min Volatility UCITS		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FLXD.L and IMV.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXD.L and IMV.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while IMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXD.L and IMV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer