PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXD.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than FRQX.L's 43.69% return.


FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*

FRQX.L

1D
-2.00%
1M
10.47%
YTD
43.69%
6M
48.15%
1Y
78.41%
3Y*
26.02%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.54%1.48%13.79%-10.42%
FRQX.L
Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF
43.69%21.13%9.39%5.79%-2.53%5.94%3.15%6.30%-4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXD.L and FRQX.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between FLXD.L and FRQX.L has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLXD.L
FRQX.L

Financial Services

35.8%
15.6%

Communication Services

16.3%
2.4%

Energy

11.6%
2.3%

Healthcare

10.3%
2.2%

Industrials

7.9%
8.9%

Basic Materials

5.2%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
2.2%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.9%

Utilities

3.1%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
4.6%

Technology

0.7%
54.7%

Financial Services

FLXD.L
35.8%
FRQX.L
15.6%

Communication Services

FLXD.L
16.3%
FRQX.L
2.4%

Energy

FLXD.L
11.6%
FRQX.L
2.3%

Healthcare

FLXD.L
10.3%
FRQX.L
2.2%

Industrials

FLXD.L
7.9%
FRQX.L
8.9%

Basic Materials

FLXD.L
5.2%
FRQX.L
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

FLXD.L
4.6%
FRQX.L
2.2%

Real Estate

FLXD.L
3.5%
FRQX.L
1.9%

Utilities

FLXD.L
3.1%
FRQX.L
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FLXD.L
1.0%
FRQX.L
4.6%

Technology

FLXD.L
0.7%
FRQX.L
54.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQX.L
FRQX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXD.LFRQX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.71

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

5.97

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

23.58

-7.84

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is lower than the FRQX.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXD.L and FRQX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXD.LFRQX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

4.05

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

1.00

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.65

-0.02

Drawdowns

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than FRQX.L's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXD.L and FRQX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXD.LFRQX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-20.77%

-8.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

-13.07%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-19.42%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

-19.42%

+7.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-2.56%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-3.94%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

3.31%

-2.01%

Volatility

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) is 2.67%, while Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that FLXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRQX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXD.LFRQX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

7.40%

-4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

16.78%

-9.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

19.27%

-10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

14.77%

-3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.91%

16.44%

-3.53%

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Dividend Comparison

FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, while FRQX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%
FRQX.L
Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXD.L and FRQX.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FRQX.L.

FLXD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while FRQX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while FRQX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXD.L and 0.40% for FRQX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXD.L and FRQX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer