FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L
FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) and FRQX.L (Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLXD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while FRQX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXD.L returned 13.18%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for FRQX.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLXD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for FRQX.L.
Performance
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXD.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than FRQX.L's 43.69% return.
FLXD.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.03%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 20.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.18%
- 10Y*
- —
FRQX.L
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 10.47%
- YTD
- 43.69%
- 6M
- 48.15%
- 1Y
- 78.41%
- 3Y*
- 26.02%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 9.29% | 31.50% | 8.51% | 9.23% | 6.26% | 10.54% | 1.48% | 13.79% | -10.42% |
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF | 43.69% | 21.13% | 9.39% | 5.79% | -2.53% | 5.94% | 3.15% | 6.30% | -4.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXD.L and FRQX.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2018 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FLXD.L and FRQX.L has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Financial Services
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Communication Services
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Energy
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Healthcare
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Industrials
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Basic Materials
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Consumer Defensive
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Real Estate
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Utilities
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Consumer Cyclical
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Technology
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLXD.L
FRQX.L
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXD.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.71 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 5.97 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.75 | 23.58 | -7.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXD.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 4.05 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.21 | 1.00 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.65 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, which is greater than FRQX.L's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXD.L and FRQX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXD.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -20.77% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.62% | -13.07% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.78% | -19.42% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.76% | -19.42% | +7.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -2.56% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -3.94% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 3.31% | -2.01% |
Volatility
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) is 2.67%, while Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF (FRQX.L) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that FLXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRQX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLXD.L | FRQX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 7.40% | -4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.95% | 16.78% | -9.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.52% | 19.27% | -10.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.85% | 14.77% | -3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 16.44% | -3.53% |
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQX.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLXD.L vs. FRQX.L - Dividend Comparison
FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, while FRQX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXD.L Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF | 4.37% | 4.90% | 5.18% | 5.75% | 5.87% | 5.51% | 3.90% | 1.53% | 1.09% |
FRQX.L Franklin AC Asia ex Japan UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLXD.L and FRQX.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FRQX.L.
FLXD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while FRQX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while FRQX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXD.L and 0.40% for FRQX.L.
Find the right allocation for FLXD.L and FRQX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer