PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXD.L achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than FLRK.L's 111.17% return.


FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*

FLRK.L

1D
-5.06%
1M
19.12%
YTD
111.17%
6M
129.46%
1Y
234.17%
3Y*
46.37%
5Y*
20.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.54%1.48%5.91%
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
111.17%82.09%-20.56%14.16%-19.37%-5.90%42.60%-14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXD.L and FLRK.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2019

0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between FLXD.L and FLRK.L has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLXD.L
FLRK.L

Financial Services

35.8%
8.7%

Communication Services

16.3%
2.3%

Energy

11.6%
0.9%

Healthcare

10.3%
3.0%

Industrials

7.9%
17.7%

Basic Materials

5.2%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
1.7%

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Utilities

3.1%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
5.5%

Technology

0.7%
57.4%

Financial Services

FLXD.L
35.8%
FLRK.L
8.7%

Communication Services

FLXD.L
16.3%
FLRK.L
2.3%

Energy

FLXD.L
11.6%
FLRK.L
0.9%

Healthcare

FLXD.L
10.3%
FLRK.L
3.0%

Industrials

FLXD.L
7.9%
FLRK.L
17.7%

Basic Materials

FLXD.L
5.2%
FLRK.L
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

FLXD.L
4.6%
FLRK.L
1.7%

Real Estate

FLXD.L
3.5%
FLRK.L

-

Utilities

FLXD.L
3.1%
FLRK.L
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FLXD.L
1.0%
FLRK.L
5.5%

Technology

FLXD.L
0.7%
FLRK.L
57.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRK.L
FLRK.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXD.LFLRK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.85

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

10.98

-5.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

39.30

-23.55

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is lower than the FLRK.L Sharpe Ratio of 6.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXD.L and FLRK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXD.LFLRK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

6.24

-3.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.81

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.67

-0.03

Drawdowns

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum FLRK.L drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXD.L and FLRK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXD.LFLRK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-41.57%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

-21.18%

+17.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-27.82%

+20.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

-38.68%

+26.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-5.62%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-19.95%

+15.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

5.93%

-4.63%

Volatility

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) is 2.67%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that FLXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLXD.LFLRK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

18.09%

-15.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

32.92%

-25.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

37.31%

-28.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

25.31%

-14.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.91%

27.31%

-14.40%

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLXD.L vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison

FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, while FLRK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLRK.L
Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLXD.L and FLRK.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLRK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLRK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXD.L.

FLXD.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLRK.L is Asia Pacific Equities. FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while FLRK.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXD.L and 0.09% for FLRK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXD.L and FLRK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer