PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FLXD.L (Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) and EUHD.L (PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS) are both Europe Equities funds - FLXD.L tracks the MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR while EUHD.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLXD.L returned 13.18%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for EUHD.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLXD.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EUHD.L.

Performance

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLXD.L is traded in GBP, while EUHD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EUHD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FLXD.L at 9.29% and EUHD.L at 9.29%.

FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.43%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
—

EUHD.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.24%
YTD
9.29%
6M
11.09%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF		9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.54%1.48%13.79%-11.21%-3.30%
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS		9.29%42.88%5.23%11.37%-3.26%13.30%-13.39%11.53%-7.27%0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between FLXD.L and EUHD.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017

0.79

The correlation between FLXD.L and EUHD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
FLXD.L
EUHD.L

Financial Services

35.8%
35.2%

Communication Services

16.3%
6.3%

Energy

11.6%
6.8%

Healthcare

10.3%
0.0%

Industrials

7.9%
3.8%

Basic Materials

5.2%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
3.7%

Real Estate

3.5%
11.6%

Utilities

3.1%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
10.4%

Technology

0.7%

-

Financial Services

FLXD.L
35.8%
EUHD.L
35.2%

Communication Services

FLXD.L
16.3%
EUHD.L
6.3%

Energy

FLXD.L
11.6%
EUHD.L
6.8%

Healthcare

FLXD.L
10.3%
EUHD.L
0.0%

Industrials

FLXD.L
7.9%
EUHD.L
3.8%

Basic Materials

FLXD.L
5.2%
EUHD.L
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

FLXD.L
4.6%
EUHD.L
3.7%

Real Estate

FLXD.L
3.5%
EUHD.L
11.6%

Utilities

FLXD.L
3.1%
EUHD.L
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

FLXD.L
1.0%
EUHD.L
10.4%

Technology

FLXD.L
0.7%
EUHD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF

PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS

Often compared with FLXD.L:
FLXD.L vs. TDGB.LFLXD.L vs. LDEG.LFLXD.L vs. XSTC.LFLXD.L vs. EQDS.LFLXD.L vs. S7XP.LFLXD.L vs. IDVY.LFLXD.L vs. VUAG.L
Often compared with EUHD.L:
EUHD.L vs. XDAX.LEUHD.L vs. LDEG.LEUHD.L vs. HDEM.LEUHD.L vs. H50E.LEUHD.L vs. SCHDEUHD.L vs. MVOL.LEUHD.L vs. TDGB.L

Return for Risk

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
EUHD.L
EUHD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUHD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) and PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FLXD.LEUHD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.40
2.18

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.51
2.88

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.64

3.39

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.75

11.84

+3.90

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the EUHD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXD.L and EUHD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FLXD.LEUHD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.18

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

0.94

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.61

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.62

+0.01

Drawdowns

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum EUHD.L drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXD.L and EUHD.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FLXD.LEUHD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-35.97%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.62%

-7.17%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.78%

-10.52%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

-19.82%

+8.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.97%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-2.09%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-5.30%

+1.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

2.06%

-0.76%

Volatility

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) is 2.67%, while PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS (EUHD.L) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that FLXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUHD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FLXD.LEUHD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

3.72%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.95%

8.70%

-1.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

11.18%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.85%

13.74%

-2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.91%

15.55%

-2.64%

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EUHD.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLXD.L vs. EUHD.L - Dividend Comparison

FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than EUHD.L's 3.95% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EUHD.L
PowerShares EURO STOXX High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS		3.95%4.61%5.86%5.50%5.44%4.28%3.06%4.66%4.34%3.41%3.51%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF		4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FLXD.L and EUHD.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EUHD.L.

FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR, while EUHD.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLXD.L and 0.30% for EUHD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLXD.L and EUHD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer