FLXB.DE vs. AMEL.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FLXB.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE).
FLXB.DE and AMEL.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLXB.DE is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Brazil 30/18 Capped. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. AMEL.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. Both FLXB.DE and AMEL.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLXB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLXB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLXB.DE Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF | 26.00% | 29.01% | -23.72% | 28.92% | 18.78% | -11.29% | -26.34% | 15.80% |
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 18.02% | 38.06% | -22.22% | 28.09% | 16.34% | -3.21% | -21.29% | 10.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLXB.DE achieves a 26.00% return, which is significantly higher than AMEL.DE's 18.02% return.
FLXB.DE
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 26.00%
- 6M
- 34.22%
- 1Y
- 43.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- —
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 18.02%
- 6M
- 28.91%
- 1Y
- 47.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLXB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLXB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AMEL.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FLXB.DE vs. AMEL.DE — Risk / Return Rank
FLXB.DE
AMEL.DE
FLXB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FLXB.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLXB.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 2.33 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.34 | 2.94 | -0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.92 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 14.90 | -3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLXB.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.33 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.64 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.14 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLXB.DE and AMEL.DE is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLXB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLXB.DE nor AMEL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FLXB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLXB.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.94%, roughly equal to the maximum AMEL.DE drawdown of -52.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXB.DE and AMEL.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLXB.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.94% | -52.69% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -12.49% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.51% | -25.38% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.24% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.71% | -18.04% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 3.25% | +0.52% |
Volatility
FLXB.DE vs. AMEL.DE - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FLXB.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.81% compared to Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) at 7.85%. This indicates that FLXB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLXB.DE | AMEL.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.81% | 7.85% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.66% | 14.83% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.18% | 20.20% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.85% | 20.82% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.25% | 25.40% | +5.85% |