FLX vs. SPY
FLX (BingEx Ltd) is a stock, while SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past year, FLX returned -22.18% vs 25.79% for SPY. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FLX vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLX achieves a -28.30% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 8.45% return.
FLX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -13.96%
- YTD
- -28.30%
- 6M
- -37.19%
- 1Y
- -22.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
FLX vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FLX BingEx Ltd | -28.30% | -61.73% | -53.86% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.45% | 17.72% | 2.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLX and SPY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2024 | 0.10 |
The correlation between FLX and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLX vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
FLX
SPY
FLX vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BingEx Ltd (FLX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.39 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 2.92 | -3.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 13.50 | -14.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 2.14 | -2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.74 | 0.58 | -1.32 |
Drawdowns
FLX vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLX drawdown since its inception was -88.01%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLX and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.01% | -55.19% | -32.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.63% | -8.88% | -37.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.34% | -2.90% | -84.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.11% | -9.05% | -64.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.26% | 1.91% | +24.35% |
Volatility
FLX vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
BingEx Ltd (FLX) has a higher volatility of 14.66% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.73%. This indicates that FLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.66% | 3.73% | +10.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.00% | 9.31% | +62.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.18% | 12.12% | +73.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.12% | 17.09% | +80.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.12% | 17.95% | +79.17% |
Dividends
FLX vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
FLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLX BingEx Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLX and SPY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLX has higher volatility (14.66%) compared to SPY (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLX dropped -88.01% vs SPY's -55.19%.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLX and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer