PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLVC.NEO achieves a 21.03% return, which is significantly lower than HAL.TO's 25.36% return.


FLVC.NEO

1D
0.06%
1M
3.34%
6M
21.68%
YTD
21.03%
1Y
34.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
24.44%

HAL.TO

1D
-0.06%
1M
4.68%
6M
19.06%
YTD
25.36%
1Y
46.98%
3Y*
23.91%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$126.22KCA$137.12KCA$491.29K
CA$48.46KCA$51.30KCA$42.68K

FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLVC.NEO
Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
21.03%21.15%13.79%
HAL.TO
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF
25.36%24.60%14.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FLVC.NEO and HAL.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLVC.NEO
FLVC.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLVC.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

HAL.TO
HAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) and Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLVC.NEOHAL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.98

1.97

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.02

9.17

+2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

52.99

41.34

+11.65

FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLVC.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 4.88, which is comparable to the HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLVC.NEO and HAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLVC.NEO drawdown since its inception was -7.89%, smaller than the maximum HAL.TO drawdown of -39.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLVC.NEO and HAL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLVC.NEOHAL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-39.70%

+31.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.21%

-5.15%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.06%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-4.73%

+3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

1.14%

-0.43%

Volatility

FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (FLVC.NEO) is 2.83%, while Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that FLVC.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HAL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLVC.NEOHAL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

3.12%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.82%

8.42%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.90%

10.13%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.39%

12.36%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.39%

17.55%

-6.16%

FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLVC.NEO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HAL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLVC.NEO vs. HAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

FLVC.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than HAL.TO's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLVC.NEO
Franklin Canadian Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.72%4.96%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HAL.TO
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF
1.82%2.37%2.79%3.60%4.84%2.99%3.57%3.03%3.50%3.32%2.99%3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLVC.NEO and HAL.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLVC.NEO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLVC.NEO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for HAL.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLVC.NEO and 0.67% for HAL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLVC.NEO and HAL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer