PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLV vs. AVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLV vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLV achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly lower than AVUS's 18.06% return.


FLV

1D
1.13%
1M
5.00%
6M
10.48%
YTD
16.26%
1Y
23.96%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.97%

AVUS

1D
1.56%
1M
3.34%
6M
13.45%
YTD
18.06%
1Y
28.92%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.31M$38.45M$43.30M
$466.37K$491.80K$1.09M

FLV vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
16.26%15.80%11.51%6.23%0.94%17.30%43.00%
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
18.06%16.68%20.43%21.77%-13.82%28.73%63.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FLV and AVUS is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2020

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between FLV and AVUS has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLV vs. AVUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLV
AVUS

Financial Services

22.7%
16.2%

Healthcare

16.8%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

12.4%
4.3%

Industrials

12.0%
10.8%

Technology

12.0%
29.7%

Energy

8.0%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
10.5%

Utilities

5.2%
2.8%

Basic Materials

3.1%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Communication Services

1.1%
7.9%

Financial Services

FLV
22.7%
AVUS
16.2%

Healthcare

FLV
16.8%
AVUS
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

FLV
12.4%
AVUS
4.3%

Industrials

FLV
12.0%
AVUS
10.8%

Technology

FLV
12.0%
AVUS
29.7%

Energy

FLV
8.0%
AVUS
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

FLV
6.7%
AVUS
10.5%

Utilities

FLV
5.2%
AVUS
2.8%

Basic Materials

FLV
3.1%
AVUS
2.8%

Real Estate

FLV
1.8%
AVUS
0.1%

Communication Services

FLV
1.1%
AVUS
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLV vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLV
FLV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLV vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLVAVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.70

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

16.33

-6.16

FLV vs. AVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the AVUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLV and AVUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLV vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLV drawdown since its inception was -15.06%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLV and AVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLVAVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-37.04%

+21.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-7.85%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.42%

-19.74%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.06%

-22.19%

+7.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-4.99%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

1.78%

+0.58%

Volatility

FLV vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison

American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS) have volatilities of 3.67% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLVAVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.86%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.94%

10.07%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

12.96%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

17.34%

-4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.23%

20.71%

-6.48%

FLV vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLV vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison

FLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than AVUS's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
0.90%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%
FLV
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF
1.48%1.90%2.07%2.07%4.98%4.05%0.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLV and AVUS have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUS has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to FLV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLV dropped -15.06% vs AVUS's -37.04%.

On 5-year performance, AVUS leads with 13.24% vs 10.66% for FLV. On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUS has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for FLV.

FLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.90% for AVUS.

FLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for FLV and 0.15% for AVUS.

FLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLV and AVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer