FLUTX vs. NQCRX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FLUTX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M) and NQCRX (Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FLUTX returned 10.98%/yr vs 14.50%/yr for NQCRX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FLUTX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NQCRX.

Performance

FLUTX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M (FLUTX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUTX achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 20.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FLUTX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 10.98%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.50% annualized return.

FLUTX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 2.31%
• 6M: 10.01%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 1Y: 25.57%
• 3Y*: 16.70%
• 5Y*: 11.42%
• 10Y*: 10.98%
• ALL TIME*: 7.55%

NQCRX

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 0.90%
• 6M: 14.65%
• YTD: 20.39%
• 1Y: 34.51%
• 3Y*: 21.61%
• 5Y*: 15.22%
• 10Y*: 14.50%
• ALL TIME*: 8.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLUTX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FLUTX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLUTX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M	13.43%	15.37%	16.60%	13.81%	-6.00%	24.95%	3.53%	23.94%	-9.82%	11.63%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	20.39%	22.44%	17.74%	13.76%	-1.07%	25.38%	-0.27%	47.63%	-15.47%	15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUTX and NQCRX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2006	0.95

The correlation between FLUTX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLUTX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLUTX

FLUTX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FLUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FLUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FLUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FLUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FLUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

NQCRX

NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 94
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLUTX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M (FLUTX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLUTX	NQCRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.57	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	3.56	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.44	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	5.37	-2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.43	20.17	-6.75

FLUTX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUTX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLUTX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUTX drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, roughly equal to the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUTX and NQCRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLUTX	NQCRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.38%	-57.85%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-6.07%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.49%	-17.21%	+1.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.54%	-17.61%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.76%	-41.84%	+2.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-0.30%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.91%	-9.93%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	1.62%	+0.10%

Volatility

FLUTX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M (FLUTX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) have volatilities of 3.10% and 3.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLUTX	NQCRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	3.10%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	9.74%	-1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.84%	12.69%	-1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.35%	15.54%	-0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.62%	18.80%	-1.18%

FLUTX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUTX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLUTX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

FLUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than NQCRX's 6.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLUTX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M	8.47%	7.71%	10.00%	2.08%	7.89%	3.93%	1.67%	1.19%	6.98%	0.50%	0.73%	0.66%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	6.07%	7.30%	6.82%	2.22%	4.63%	20.85%	17.95%	26.88%	34.12%	27.42%	10.74%	61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLUTX and NQCRX in my portfolio?

FLUTX and NQCRX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLUTX or NQCRX?

NQCRX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to FLUTX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUTX dropped -59.38% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.