PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUTX vs. HFCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLUTX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M (FLUTX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUTX achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 11.85% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLUTX having a 11.02% annualized return and HFCVX not far ahead at 11.25%.


FLUTX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.72%
YTD
8.99%
6M
8.39%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
11.02%

HFCVX

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.88%
YTD
11.85%
6M
12.00%
1Y
22.15%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUTX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLUTX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M
8.99%15.37%16.60%13.81%-6.00%24.95%3.53%23.94%-9.82%11.63%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
11.85%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUTX and HFCVX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between FLUTX and HFCVX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLUTX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUTX
FLUTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FLUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUTX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M (FLUTX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLUTXHFCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

5.89

-2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.93

17.08

-4.15

FLUTX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUTX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLUTX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUTX drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUTX and HFCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUTXHFCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.38%

-65.75%

+6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.09%

-3.77%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-11.32%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-16.81%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

-39.39%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-2.88%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-8.22%

-1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.30%

+0.46%

Volatility

FLUTX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M (FLUTX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) have volatilities of 3.26% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLUTXHFCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.21%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

6.99%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.79%

9.39%

+1.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

13.24%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.69%

16.46%

+1.23%

FLUTX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUTX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLUTX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

FLUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.81%, more than HFCVX's 6.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLUTX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class M
8.81%7.71%10.00%2.08%7.89%3.93%1.67%1.19%6.98%0.50%0.73%0.66%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.61%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLUTX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLUTX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to HFCVX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUTX dropped -59.38% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLUTX and HFCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer