FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FLUR.NEO (Franklin International Equity Index ETF) and ZEA.TO (BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FLUR.NEO tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index-NR while ZEA.TO tracks the MSCI EAFE Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLUR.NEO returned 10.84%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for ZEA.TO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLUR.NEO charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for ZEA.TO.

Performance

FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR.NEO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FLUR.NEO having a 13.01% return and ZEA.TO slightly lower at 12.80%.

FLUR.NEO

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 13.01%
• 6M: 12.76%
• 1Y: 26.23%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: 10.84%
• 10Y*: —

ZEA.TO

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 2.20%
• YTD: 12.80%
• 6M: 12.68%
• 1Y: 25.55%
• 3Y*: 19.60%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 11.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FLUR.NEO Franklin International Equity Index ETF	13.01%	25.68%	12.42%	12.87%	-10.40%	14.74%	9.77%	14.40%
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF	12.80%	24.92%	11.58%	16.04%	-8.50%	10.66%	5.15%	12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUR.NEO and ZEA.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2019	0.70

The correlation between FLUR.NEO and ZEA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUR.NEO

FLUR.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 57
FLUR.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
FLUR.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FLUR.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FLUR.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
FLUR.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 57

ZEA.TO

ZEA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 60
ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ZEA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
ZEA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ZEA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ZEA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR.NEO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLUR.NEO	ZEA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.77	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.52	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.33	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	2.35	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.98	9.06	-0.08

FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUR.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUR.NEO and ZEA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUR.NEO drawdown since its inception was -30.20%, which is greater than ZEA.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUR.NEO and ZEA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLUR.NEO	ZEA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.20%	-27.80%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.21%	-10.91%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.64%	-14.11%	-0.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.44%	-23.66%	-3.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.40%	-1.50%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-4.61%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	2.83%	+0.11%

Volatility

FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR.NEO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) have volatilities of 5.08% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLUR.NEO	ZEA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	4.91%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	12.42%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.39%	14.49%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.07%	13.63%	+1.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	14.78%	+2.19%

FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUR.NEO has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEA.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLUR.NEO vs. ZEA.TO - Dividend Comparison

FLUR.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than ZEA.TO's 1.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLUR.NEO Franklin International Equity Index ETF	1.77%	2.40%	2.76%	2.71%	2.95%	1.85%	1.97%	3.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF	1.89%	2.17%	2.78%	3.02%	3.08%	2.49%	2.74%	2.95%	3.05%	2.40%	2.80%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLUR.NEO and ZEA.TO in my portfolio?

FLUR.NEO and ZEA.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLUR.NEO or ZEA.TO?

On fees, ZEA.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLUR.NEO or ZEA.TO?

ZEA.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for FLUR.NEO.

What is the main difference between FLUR.NEO and ZEA.TO?

FLUR.NEO tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD Index-NR, while ZEA.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for FLUR.NEO and 0.22% for ZEA.TO.