FLUD vs. TBLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLUD (Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF) and TBLL (Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. FLUD is actively managed, while TBLL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLUD returned 3.63%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for TBLL. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLUD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for TBLL.

Performance

FLUD vs. TBLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUD achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than TBLL's 1.43% return.

FLUD

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 1.53%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: 4.60%
• 3Y*: 5.33%
• 5Y*: 3.63%
• 10Y*: —

TBLL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 3.93%
• 3Y*: 4.66%
• 5Y*: 3.35%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUD vs. TBLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.53%	5.36%	5.44%	5.95%	0.16%	0.09%	0.77%
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF	1.43%	4.21%	5.11%	5.01%	1.11%	-0.01%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUD and TBLL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2020	0.19

The correlation between FLUD and TBLL shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FLUD vs. TBLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLUD	TBLL
Financial Services	13.9%	64.0%
Industrials	2.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.9%	-
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Healthcare	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	0.9%	-
Communication Services	0.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-
Utilities	0.2%	-
Technology	0.1%	-
Energy	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

FLUD vs. TBLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUD

FLUD Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FLUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FLUD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FLUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLUD Martin Ratio Rank: 97

TBLL

TBLL Risk / Return Rank: 100
TBLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
TBLL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUD vs. TBLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLUD	TBLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	20.94	-18.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	218.31	-213.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	102.92	-101.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.55	416.84	-406.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.82	3,533.11	-3,491.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLUD vs. TBLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUD Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is lower than the TBLL Sharpe Ratio of 20.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUD and TBLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLUD	TBLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	20.94	-18.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.73	7.53	-4.80
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.59	4.26	-1.67

Drawdowns

FLUD vs. TBLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUD drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, which is greater than TBLL's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUD and TBLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLUD	TBLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-0.63%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.44%	-0.01%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.59%	-0.36%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.66%	-0.36%	-1.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-0.14%	-0.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.11%	0.00%	+0.11%

Volatility

FLUD vs. TBLL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) has a higher volatility of 0.33% compared to Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF (TBLL) at 0.05%. This indicates that FLUD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLUD	TBLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.33%	0.05%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.74%	0.12%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.68%	0.19%	+1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.34%	0.45%	+0.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.26%	0.56%	+0.70%

FLUD vs. TBLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TBLL's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLUD vs. TBLL - Dividend Comparison

FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, more than TBLL's 3.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.27%	4.51%	4.97%	4.72%	1.39%	0.92%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TBLL Invesco Short Term Treasury ETF	3.81%	4.08%	4.99%	4.63%	1.37%	0.03%	0.80%	2.08%	1.69%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLUD and TBLL in my portfolio?

FLUD and TBLL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLUD or TBLL?

FLUD has higher volatility (0.33%) compared to TBLL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUD dropped -1.66% vs TBLL's -0.63%.

Which ETF is better, FLUD or TBLL?

On 5-year performance, FLUD leads with 3.63% vs 3.35% for TBLL. On fees, TBLL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TBLL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLUD or TBLL?

Over the 5-year period, FLUD has performed better with a 3.63% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLUD or TBLL?

TBLL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLUD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLUD or TBLL?

FLUD has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 3.81% for TBLL.

What is the main difference between FLUD and TBLL?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLUD and 0.08% for TBLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TBLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.94 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.