FLUD vs. PBDC

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FLUD (Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF) and PBDC (Putnam BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLUD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while PBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLUD returned 5.20%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for PBDC. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLUD charges 0.15%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for PBDC.

Performance

FLUD vs. PBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUD achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly higher than PBDC's -6.86% return.

FLUD

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 1.67%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 1Y: 4.14%
• 3Y*: 5.20%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.24%

PBDC

• 1D: 2.58%
• 1M: 1.53%
• 6M: -3.75%
• YTD: -6.86%
• 1Y: -10.01%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	$1.79M	$5.31M	$7.39M
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF	$3.20M	$3.19M	$3.74M

FLUD vs. PBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	2.05%	5.36%	5.44%	5.95%	1.04%
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF	-6.86%	-1.77%	19.43%	30.52%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUD and PBDC is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022	0.02

Return for Risk

FLUD vs. PBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLUD

FLUD Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FLUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FLUD Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FLUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLUD Martin Ratio Rank: 98

PBDC

PBDC Risk / Return Rank: 5
PBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLUD vs. PBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLUD	PBDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	-0.53	+3.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.33	-0.64	+4.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	0.93	+0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.51	-0.57	+10.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	39.28	-0.97	+40.25

FLUD vs. PBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUD Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the PBDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUD and PBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLUD vs. PBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUD drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, smaller than the maximum PBDC drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUD and PBDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLUD	PBDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.66%	-20.47%	+18.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.44%	-17.71%	+17.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.59%	-20.47%	+19.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-14.56%	+14.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-5.17%	+4.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.11%	10.35%	-10.24%

Volatility

FLUD vs. PBDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) is 0.24%, while Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that FLUD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLUD	PBDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.24%	5.07%	-4.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.77%	15.41%	-14.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52%	19.06%	-17.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.34%	17.04%	-15.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.25%	17.04%	-15.79%

FLUD vs. PBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDC's 13.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLUD vs. PBDC - Dividend Comparison

FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than PBDC's 11.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.11%	4.51%	4.97%	4.72%	1.39%	0.92%	0.93%
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF	11.29%	10.53%	9.29%	9.86%	3.40%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLUD and PBDC in my portfolio?

FLUD and PBDC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLUD or PBDC?

PBDC has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to FLUD (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLUD dropped -1.66% vs PBDC's -20.47%.

Which ETF is better, FLUD or PBDC?

On 3-year performance, PBDC leads with 5.49% vs 5.20% for FLUD. On fees, FLUD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLUD has been the lower-risk option at 0.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLUD or PBDC?

Over the 3-year period, PBDC has performed better with a 5.49% return vs 5.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLUD or PBDC?

FLUD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 13.49% for PBDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLUD or PBDC?

PBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 4.11% for FLUD.

What is the main difference between FLUD and PBDC?

FLUD is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while PBDC is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLUD and 13.49% for PBDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.