PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUD vs. FGDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLUD vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLUD vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
0.68%5.36%5.44%5.95%1.28%
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
7.93%64.15%27.31%12.92%0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUD achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than FGDL's 7.93% return.


FLUD

1D
0.14%
1M
0.03%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.74%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*

FGDL

1D
3.39%
1M
-11.22%
YTD
7.93%
6M
20.34%
1Y
48.63%
3Y*
33.11%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLUD vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLUD and FGDL have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLUD vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUD
FLUD Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUD Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FGDL
FGDL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FGDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FGDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGDL Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUD vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLUDFGDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.61

1.75

+0.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.10

2.16

+1.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.32

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.63

2.64

+7.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

39.41

9.52

+29.89

FLUD vs. FGDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUD Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the FGDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUD and FGDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLUDFGDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.75

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.54

1.52

+1.02

Correlation

The correlation between FLUD and FGDL is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLUD vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison

FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.48%4.51%4.97%4.72%1.39%0.92%0.93%
FGDL
Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLUD vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUD drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, smaller than the maximum FGDL drawdown of -19.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUD and FGDL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUDFGDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-19.23%

+17.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.44%

-19.23%

+18.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-13.76%

+13.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-3.34%

+3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

5.33%

-5.21%

Volatility

FLUD vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) is 0.38%, while Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) has a volatility of 10.75%. This indicates that FLUD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLUDFGDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

10.75%

-10.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.12%

24.37%

-23.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74%

28.00%

-26.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.32%

18.96%

-17.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.27%

18.96%

-17.69%