FLUC.L vs. GFA.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

FLUC.L (Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and GFA.L (VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - FLUC.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate - Investment Grade Index, while GFA.L is a Global High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLUC.L returned -0.29%/yr vs 2.98%/yr for GFA.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLUC.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GFA.L.

Performance

FLUC.L vs. GFA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLUC.L) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GFA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUC.L achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than GFA.L's 3.55% return.

FLUC.L

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.38%
• 6M: -0.09%
• YTD: -0.38%
• 1Y: 4.18%
• 3Y*: 4.44%
• 5Y*: -0.29%
• 10Y*: —

GFA.L

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 3.30%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 1Y: 6.91%
• 3Y*: 8.15%
• 5Y*: 2.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLUC.L vs. GFA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	-0.38%	7.46%	2.08%	7.77%	-15.53%	-2.24%	9.76%	14.52%	0.68%
GFA.L VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	3.55%	9.97%	6.02%	10.29%	-12.56%	1.93%	16.95%	13.34%	-2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FLUC.L and GFA.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2018	0.40

The correlation between FLUC.L and GFA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLUC.L vs. GFA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUC.L

FLUC.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
FLUC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FLUC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
FLUC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FLUC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FLUC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 37

GFA.L

GFA.L Risk / Return Rank: 40
GFA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
GFA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
GFA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GFA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
GFA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUC.L vs. GFA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLUC.L) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GFA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLUC.L	GFA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	1.06	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.50	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.21	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	1.76	-0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.39	4.76	-0.38

FLUC.L vs. GFA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the GFA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUC.L and GFA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLUC.L vs. GFA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUC.L drawdown since its inception was -22.30%, roughly equal to the maximum GFA.L drawdown of -22.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUC.L and GFA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLUC.L	GFA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.30%	-22.98%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.61%	-3.90%	+1.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.03%	-5.03%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.12%	-22.54%	+0.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.74%	-0.80%	-1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.53%	-4.38%	-2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.45%	-0.50%

Volatility

FLUC.L vs. GFA.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLUC.L) and VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (GFA.L) have volatilities of 1.37% and 1.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLUC.L	GFA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	1.33%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.75%	5.65%	-1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.93%	6.49%	-1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.76%	8.25%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.08%	8.42%	-1.34%

FLUC.L vs. GFA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLUC.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GFA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLUC.L vs. GFA.L - Dividend Comparison

FLUC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, while GFA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLUC.L Franklin USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	4.22%	4.01%	4.26%	3.38%	2.76%	2.17%	2.29%	3.37%	1.61%
GFA.L VanEck Global Fallen Angel High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLUC.L and GFA.L in my portfolio?

FLUC.L and GFA.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FLUC.L or GFA.L?

On fees, FLUC.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLUC.L or GFA.L?

FLUC.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GFA.L.

What is the main difference between FLUC.L and GFA.L?

FLUC.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while GFA.L is Global High Yield Bonds. FLUC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate - Investment Grade Index, while GFA.L tracks ICE Global Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FLUC.L and 0.40% for GFA.L.