PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and TWD/USD (TWDUSD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a 54.24% return, which is significantly higher than TWDUSD=X's -3.20% return.


FLTW

1D
-2.71%
1M
-8.92%
6M
44.37%
YTD
54.24%
1Y
77.22%
3Y*
36.00%
5Y*
18.78%
10Y*

TWDUSD=X

1D
-0.46%
1M
-2.31%
6M
-2.34%
YTD
-3.20%
1Y
-9.21%
3Y*
-1.47%
5Y*
-2.87%
10Y*
-0.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
54.24%32.00%16.68%30.05%-27.51%29.46%29.77%31.23%-9.32%-1.28%
TWDUSD=X
TWD/USD
-3.20%4.63%-6.51%-0.14%-9.57%1.47%6.35%2.23%-2.82%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTW and TWDUSD=X is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTW
FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TWDUSD=X
TWDUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TWDUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWDUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWDUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
TWDUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWDUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and TWD/USD (TWDUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTWTWDUSD=XDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.78

+0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.48

-0.77

+6.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.48

-1.16

+19.64

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTW Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the TWDUSD=X Sharpe Ratio of -1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTW and TWDUSD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than TWDUSD=X's maximum drawdown of -17.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and TWDUSD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTWTWDUSD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-17.28%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.18%

-9.67%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-10.69%

-15.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-17.28%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.18%

-15.09%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-6.93%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

3.62%

+0.57%

Volatility

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a higher volatility of 12.84% compared to TWD/USD (TWDUSD=X) at 1.07%. This indicates that FLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWDUSD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTWTWDUSD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.84%

1.07%

+11.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.01%

3.21%

+23.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.29%

5.15%

+25.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

6.21%

+17.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.37%

5.56%

+16.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTW and TWDUSD=X have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLTW has higher volatility (12.84%) compared to TWDUSD=X (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTW dropped -38.00% vs TWDUSD=X's -17.28%.

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs -1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTW and TWDUSD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer