PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and TWD/USD (TWDUSD=X). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a 68.03% return, which is significantly higher than TWDUSD=X's -1.49% return.


FLTW

1D
0.30%
1M
1.95%
YTD
68.03%
6M
70.67%
1Y
100.47%
3Y*
41.55%
5Y*
21.23%
10Y*

TWDUSD=X

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
-1.49%
6M
-0.89%
1Y
-8.00%
3Y*
-0.85%
5Y*
-2.63%
10Y*
0.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
68.03%32.00%16.68%30.05%-27.51%29.46%29.77%31.23%-9.32%-1.28%
TWDUSD=X
TWD/USD
-1.49%4.63%-6.51%-0.14%-9.57%1.47%6.35%2.23%-2.82%1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTW and TWDUSD=X is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTW
FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

TWDUSD=X
TWDUSD=X Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TWDUSD=X Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWDUSD=X Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWDUSD=X Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TWDUSD=X Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWDUSD=X Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and TWD/USD (TWDUSD=X). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTWTWDUSD=XDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.81

+0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.29

-0.66

+9.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.41

-0.92

+28.32

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTW Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the TWDUSD=X Sharpe Ratio of -1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTW and TWDUSD=X, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than TWDUSD=X's maximum drawdown of -17.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and TWDUSD=X.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTWTWDUSD=XDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-17.28%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-9.90%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-9.90%

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-17.28%

-20.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.50%

-13.60%

+7.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-6.88%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.68%

4.19%

-0.51%

Volatility

FLTW vs. TWDUSD=X - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a higher volatility of 14.85% compared to TWD/USD (TWDUSD=X) at 1.11%. This indicates that FLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TWDUSD=X based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTWTWDUSD=XDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.85%

1.11%

+13.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.08%

3.26%

+21.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.96%

5.24%

+23.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.23%

6.21%

+17.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

5.56%

+16.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTW and TWDUSD=X have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLTW has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to TWDUSD=X (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTW dropped -38.00% vs TWDUSD=X's -17.28%.

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTW and TWDUSD=X

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer