PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTW vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTW vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a 65.68% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 108.47% return.


FLTW

1D
0.59%
1M
9.23%
YTD
65.68%
6M
71.97%
1Y
100.51%
3Y*
39.63%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*

FTXL

1D
2.27%
1M
10.09%
YTD
108.47%
6M
110.95%
1Y
197.22%
3Y*
57.13%
5Y*
33.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTW vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
65.68%32.00%16.68%30.05%-27.51%29.46%29.77%31.23%-9.32%-1.28%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
108.47%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%-2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTW and FTXL is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.64

The correlation between FLTW and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

FLTW vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLTW
FTXL

Technology

75.6%
99.5%

Financial Services

12.6%

-

Industrials

4.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

2.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%

-

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Healthcare

0.6%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

FLTW
75.6%
FTXL
99.5%

Financial Services

FLTW
12.6%
FTXL

-

Industrials

FLTW
4.0%
FTXL
0.5%

Basic Materials

FLTW
2.9%
FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

FLTW
1.7%
FTXL

-

Communication Services

FLTW
1.6%
FTXL

-

Consumer Defensive

FLTW
0.9%
FTXL

-

Healthcare

FLTW
0.6%
FTXL

-

Energy

FLTW
0.1%
FTXL

-

Real Estate

FLTW

-

FTXL

-

Utilities

FLTW

-

FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTW vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTW
FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTW vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTWFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.66

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.29

13.68

-4.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.95

47.98

-20.04

FLTW vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTW Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is comparable to the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 5.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTW and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTW vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTWFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-43.87%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-14.51%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-41.57%

+15.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-43.87%

+5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-3.35%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-10.54%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

4.13%

-0.52%

Volatility

FLTW vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) is 15.27%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 19.23%. This indicates that FLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTWFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.27%

19.23%

-3.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.85%

32.79%

-8.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.98%

38.90%

-10.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

36.63%

-13.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

34.55%

-12.52%

FLTW vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTW has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLTW vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

FLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than FTXL's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
1.51%2.51%1.89%2.85%3.16%2.31%2.14%3.00%1.06%0.00%0.00%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.13%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTW and FTXL have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (19.23%) compared to FLTW (15.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTW dropped -38.00% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 33.62% vs 20.89% for FLTW. On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLTW has been the lower-risk option at 15.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 33.62% return vs 20.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.

FLTW has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.13% for FTXL.

FLTW is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLTW and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.10 vs 3.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTW and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer