PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTW vs. EZBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLTW vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLTW vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
13.05%32.00%21.88%
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
-22.09%-6.56%100.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -22.09% return.


FLTW

1D
0.98%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
13.05%
6M
18.97%
1Y
60.86%
3Y*
25.91%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*

EZBC

1D
0.59%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
-22.09%
6M
-42.07%
1Y
-19.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLTW vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLTW and EZBC have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLTW vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTW
FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

EZBC
EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTW vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLTWEZBCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

-0.44

+2.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

-0.37

+3.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.96

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

-0.35

+4.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.28

-0.75

+17.03

FLTW vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTW Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTW and EZBC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLTWEZBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

-0.44

+2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.36

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between FLTW and EZBC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLTW vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

FLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
2.22%2.51%1.89%2.85%3.16%2.31%2.14%3.00%1.06%
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FLTW vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and EZBC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTWEZBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-49.37%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.81%

-49.37%

+33.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.55%

-45.77%

+38.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-14.18%

+5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

23.25%

-19.36%

Volatility

FLTW vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) is 10.06%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 13.02%. This indicates that FLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLTWEZBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.06%

13.02%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.45%

36.81%

-18.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.53%

45.37%

-17.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.06%

51.08%

-29.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.30%

51.08%

-29.78%