FLTW vs. DIVI
FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTW is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLTW returned 23.20%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for DIVI. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLTW charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.
Performance
FLTW vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTW achieves a 79.72% return, which is significantly higher than DIVI's 12.98% return.
FLTW
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 15.81%
- YTD
- 79.72%
- 6M
- 83.89%
- 1Y
- 124.51%
- 3Y*
- 44.92%
- 5Y*
- 23.20%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 12.98%
- 6M
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
FLTW vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 79.72% | 32.00% | 16.68% | 30.05% | -27.51% | 29.46% | 29.77% | 31.23% | -9.32% | -1.28% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 12.98% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -6.73% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTW and DIVI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FLTW and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLTW vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLTW
DIVI
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FLTW
DIVI
Financial Services
FLTW
DIVI
Industrials
FLTW
DIVI
Basic Materials
FLTW
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
FLTW
DIVI
Communication Services
FLTW
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
FLTW
DIVI
Healthcare
FLTW
DIVI
Energy
FLTW
DIVI
Real Estate
FLTW
-
DIVI
Utilities
FLTW
-
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTW vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FLTW
DIVI
FLTW vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLTW | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.36 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.52 | 2.93 | +8.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.60 | 11.27 | +23.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLTW vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTW drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTW and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTW | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.00% | -27.76% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.87% | -10.54% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.45% | -14.58% | -11.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.00% | -18.53% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -3.62% | -4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 2.73% | +0.88% |
Volatility
FLTW vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a higher volatility of 14.69% compared to Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) at 4.76%. This indicates that FLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTW | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.69% | 4.76% | +9.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.19% | 12.78% | +11.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.45% | 15.22% | +13.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.07% | 15.40% | +7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 16.45% | +5.66% |
FLTW vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTW has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLTW vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than DIVI's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.01% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 1.33% | 2.51% | 1.89% | 2.85% | 3.16% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 3.00% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTW and DIVI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLTW has higher volatility (14.69%) compared to DIVI (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTW dropped -38.00% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 5-year performance, FLTW leads with 23.20% vs 13.96% for DIVI. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 23.20% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLTW.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.33% for FLTW.
FLTW is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index, while DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLTW and 0.09% for DIVI.
FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.41 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTW and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer