PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) and Carlsberg A/S (CARL-B.CO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLTR.L is traded in GBp, while CARL-B.CO is traded in DKK. To make them comparable, the CARL-B.CO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTR.L achieves a -50.01% return, which is significantly lower than CARL-B.CO's 3.23% return.


FLTR.L

1D
-3.33%
1M
15.53%
YTD
-50.01%
6M
-51.70%
1Y
-59.06%
3Y*
-20.04%
5Y*
-10.32%
10Y*

CARL-B.CO

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.13%
YTD
3.23%
6M
2.65%
1Y
-5.38%
3Y*
-4.41%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*
6.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLTR.L
Flutter Entertainment plc
-50.01%-22.15%48.64%23.47%-4.00%-22.17%69.22%64.62%
CARL-B.CO
Carlsberg A/S
3.23%31.11%-20.03%-7.63%-11.42%10.35%7.23%6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTR.L and CARL-B.CO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2019

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTR.L
FLTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FLTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

CARL-B.CO
CARL-B.CO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CARL-B.CO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARL-B.CO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARL-B.CO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CARL-B.CO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARL-B.CO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) and Carlsberg A/S (CARL-B.CO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTR.LCARL-B.CODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

0.98

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.28

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

-0.46

-0.93

FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTR.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the CARL-B.CO Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTR.L and CARL-B.CO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTR.L drawdown since its inception was -70.59%, roughly equal to the maximum CARL-B.CO drawdown of -69.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR.L and CARL-B.CO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTR.LCARL-B.CODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.59%

-69.34%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.91%

-20.59%

-49.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.59%

-38.43%

-32.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.59%

-41.85%

-28.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.87%

-20.14%

-45.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-15.84%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.67%

12.44%

+30.23%

Volatility

FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO - Volatility Comparison

Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Carlsberg A/S (CARL-B.CO) at 7.60%. This indicates that FLTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARL-B.CO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTR.LCARL-B.CODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.29%

7.60%

+4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.23%

17.81%

+16.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.97%

22.95%

+19.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.82%

23.89%

+13.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.65%

22.69%

+15.96%

Dividends

FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO - Dividend Comparison

FLTR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CARL-B.CO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARL-B.CO
Carlsberg A/S
3.44%3.23%3.91%3.19%2.60%1.95%2.15%1.81%2.31%1.34%1.48%1.47%
FLTR.L
Flutter Entertainment plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FLTR.L vs. CARL-B.CO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flutter Entertainment plc and Carlsberg A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. FLTR.L values in USD, CARL-B.CO values in DKK

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTR.L and CARL-B.CO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTR.L and CARL-B.CO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer