PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a DKK 10,000 investment in Carlsberg A/S (CARL-B.CO) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CARL-B.CO is traded in DKK, while BA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BA.L values have been converted to DKK using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARL-B.CO achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly lower than BA.L's 12.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CARL-B.CO has underperformed BA.L with an annualized return of 5.14%, while BA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.30% annualized return.


CARL-B.CO

1D
-1.54%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
1.13%
6M
3.56%
1Y
-11.54%
3Y*
-5.04%
5Y*
-3.03%
10Y*
5.14%

BA.L

1D
0.80%
1M
-8.35%
YTD
12.89%
6M
15.74%
1Y
-4.86%
3Y*
29.28%
5Y*
32.28%
10Y*
17.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CARL-B.CO
Carlsberg A/S
1.13%24.73%-16.11%-5.74%-15.78%18.41%1.01%46.68%-4.93%24.15%
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
12.89%44.44%11.04%36.48%52.68%25.05%-14.55%36.70%-17.58%-3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CARL-B.CO and BA.L is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.22

The correlation between CARL-B.CO and BA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARL-B.CO
CARL-B.CO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CARL-B.CO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARL-B.CO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARL-B.CO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CARL-B.CO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARL-B.CO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BA.L
BA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlsberg A/S (CARL-B.CO) and BAE Systems plc (BA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARL-B.COBA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.00

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

-0.18

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.87

-0.37

-0.49

CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARL-B.CO Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the BA.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARL-B.CO and BA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARL-B.COBA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

-0.13

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

1.22

-1.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.66

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.41

-0.19

Drawdowns

CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARL-B.CO drawdown since its inception was -75.46%, which is greater than BA.L's maximum drawdown of -55.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARL-B.CO and BA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARL-B.COBA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.46%

-55.26%

-20.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.24%

-21.88%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.63%

-21.88%

-14.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.46%

-21.88%

-17.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.46%

-42.32%

+2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.50%

-17.86%

-3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-17.83%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.39%

10.21%

+4.18%

Volatility

CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carlsberg A/S (CARL-B.CO) is 7.96%, while BAE Systems plc (BA.L) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that CARL-B.CO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARL-B.COBA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

10.00%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.71%

24.15%

-6.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.70%

30.43%

-7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

26.49%

-3.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.93%

26.28%

-4.35%

Dividends

CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L - Dividend Comparison

CARL-B.CO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than BA.L's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BA.L
BAE Systems plc
0.72%1.99%2.69%2.53%2.99%4.40%4.75%4.00%4.79%3.75%3.57%4.14%
CARL-B.CO
Carlsberg A/S
3.55%3.23%3.91%3.19%2.60%1.95%2.15%1.81%2.31%1.34%1.48%1.47%

Financials

CARL-B.CO vs. BA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carlsberg A/S and BAE Systems plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CARL-B.CO values in DKK, BA.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


CARL-B.CO and BA.L have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARL-B.CO and BA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer