PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) and Wynn Macau Ltd (1128.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLTR.L is traded in GBp, while 1128.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 1128.HK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTR.L achieves a -50.01% return, which is significantly lower than 1128.HK's -5.17% return.


FLTR.L

1D
-3.33%
1M
15.53%
YTD
-50.01%
6M
-51.70%
1Y
-59.06%
3Y*
-20.04%
5Y*
-10.32%
10Y*

1128.HK

1D
0.29%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-5.17%
6M
-10.52%
1Y
15.21%
3Y*
-7.87%
5Y*
-13.38%
10Y*
-4.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FLTR.L
Flutter Entertainment plc
-50.01%-22.15%48.64%23.47%-4.00%-22.17%69.22%64.62%
1128.HK
Wynn Macau Ltd
-5.17%8.61%-12.19%-29.78%52.55%-50.89%-33.86%17.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTR.L and 1128.HK is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2019

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTR.L
FLTR.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FLTR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

1128.HK
1128.HK Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
1128.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1128.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
1128.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
1128.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
1128.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) and Wynn Macau Ltd (1128.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTR.L1128.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

1.11

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

0.53

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.39

0.93

-2.31

FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTR.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the 1128.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTR.L and 1128.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTR.L drawdown since its inception was -70.59%, smaller than the maximum 1128.HK drawdown of -87.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTR.L and 1128.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTR.L1128.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.59%

-87.60%

+17.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.91%

-26.65%

-43.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.59%

-43.54%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.59%

-72.45%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.87%

-78.31%

+12.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-42.71%

+23.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.67%

15.07%

+27.60%

Volatility

FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK - Volatility Comparison

Flutter Entertainment plc (FLTR.L) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Wynn Macau Ltd (1128.HK) at 8.91%. This indicates that FLTR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1128.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTR.L1128.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.29%

8.91%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.23%

17.84%

+16.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.97%

31.14%

+10.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.82%

49.66%

-11.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.65%

45.52%

-6.87%

Dividends

FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK - Dividend Comparison

FLTR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 1128.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1128.HK
Wynn Macau Ltd
7.53%6.23%2.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.69%6.26%2.55%4.86%11.59%
FLTR.L
Flutter Entertainment plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FLTR.L vs. 1128.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Flutter Entertainment plc and Wynn Macau Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. FLTR.L values in USD, 1128.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTR.L and 1128.HK have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTR.L and 1128.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer