PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLTDX vs. MPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLTDX vs. MPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund (FLTDX) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLTDX achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than MPA's 4.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTDX has outperformed MPA with an annualized return of 1.76%, while MPA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.65% annualized return.


FLTDX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.86%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.95%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
1.76%

MPA

1D
0.09%
1M
1.14%
YTD
4.22%
6M
4.60%
1Y
11.23%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
-1.41%
10Y*
1.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLTDX vs. MPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLTDX
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund
0.63%4.30%1.47%4.09%-4.08%0.98%3.42%5.05%1.73%3.15%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
4.22%1.82%6.23%9.67%-31.00%17.06%9.14%18.87%-8.00%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FLTDX and MPA is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1994

0.25

The correlation between FLTDX and MPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLTDX vs. MPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLTDX
FLTDX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FLTDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MPA
MPA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLTDX vs. MPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund (FLTDX) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLTDXMPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.25

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.76

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

6.90

-1.94

FLTDX vs. MPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLTDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the MPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLTDX and MPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLTDX vs. MPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLTDX drawdown since its inception was -8.57%, smaller than the maximum MPA drawdown of -44.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTDX and MPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLTDXMPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-44.78%

+36.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.97%

-6.42%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.07%

-14.77%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.92%

-38.10%

+31.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.57%

-38.10%

+29.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-17.06%

+16.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-9.78%

+9.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

1.63%

-0.89%

Volatility

FLTDX vs. MPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund (FLTDX) is 0.47%, while BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) has a volatility of 1.85%. This indicates that FLTDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLTDXMPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

1.85%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.31%

6.10%

-4.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67%

8.09%

-6.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.21%

12.12%

-9.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.42%

12.33%

-9.91%

FLTDX vs. MPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLTDX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MPA's 2.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLTDX vs. MPA - Dividend Comparison

FLTDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than MPA's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLTDX
Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund
2.49%2.72%2.48%1.95%1.36%1.15%1.93%2.11%1.89%1.82%1.86%1.84%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
5.90%6.98%6.02%3.63%5.60%3.94%4.12%4.16%5.40%5.22%5.56%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLTDX and MPA have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPA has higher volatility (1.85%) compared to FLTDX (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTDX dropped -8.57% vs MPA's -44.78%.

FLTDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLTDX and MPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer