FLTB vs. LDUR
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR).
FLTB and LDUR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLTB is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014. LDUR is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jan 22, 2014.
Performance
FLTB vs. LDUR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLTB vs. LDUR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 0.14% | 6.60% | 5.14% | 5.94% | -5.88% | -1.20% | 5.57% | 5.87% | 1.06% | 2.10% |
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 0.43% | 5.76% | 5.14% | 4.78% | -4.23% | -0.55% | 4.49% | 4.27% | 1.05% | 2.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than LDUR's 0.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FLTB having a 2.47% annualized return and LDUR not far ahead at 2.51%.
FLTB
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
LDUR
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLTB vs. LDUR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LDUR's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLTB vs. LDUR — Risk / Return Rank
FLTB
LDUR
FLTB vs. LDUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLTB | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.99 | 2.32 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 3.50 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.69 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 17.57 | -4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLTB | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.32 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 1.07 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.90 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.86 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTB and LDUR is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLTB vs. LDUR - Dividend Comparison
FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than LDUR's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 4.37% | 4.31% | 4.11% | 3.20% | 1.63% | 0.89% | 1.56% | 2.67% | 2.50% | 1.78% | 1.59% | 1.63% |
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 4.43% | 4.60% | 4.77% | 4.11% | 2.22% | 0.90% | 2.15% | 3.14% | 2.66% | 2.08% | 1.85% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
FLTB vs. LDUR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, which is greater than LDUR's maximum drawdown of -8.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and LDUR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTB | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -8.68% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.52% | -1.17% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.26% | -6.75% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.37% | -8.68% | -0.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.44% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -0.86% | -0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.37% | 0.25% | +0.12% |
Volatility
FLTB vs. LDUR - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) at 0.75%. This indicates that FLTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLTB | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 0.75% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.50% | 1.12% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27% | 1.86% | +0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.78% | 2.02% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.93% | 2.79% | +0.14% |