FLTB vs. SCHD
FLTB (Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLTB is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. FLTB is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FLTB returned 2.47%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLTB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
FLTB vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLTB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FLTB has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 2.47%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.79% annualized return.
FLTB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
FLTB vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 0.84% | 6.60% | 5.14% | 5.94% | -5.88% | -1.20% | 5.57% | 5.87% | 1.06% | 2.10% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.82% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLTB and SCHD is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2014 | 0.07 |
The correlation between FLTB and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.20 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FLTB vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLTB
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
FLTB
SCHD
Financial Services
FLTB
SCHD
Basic Materials
FLTB
-
SCHD
Communication Services
FLTB
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
FLTB
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
FLTB
-
SCHD
Energy
FLTB
-
SCHD
Healthcare
FLTB
-
SCHD
Industrials
FLTB
-
SCHD
Real Estate
FLTB
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
FLTB
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLTB vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
FLTB
SCHD
FLTB vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLTB | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.47 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 6.26 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.23 | 15.38 | -3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLTB | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.64 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.59 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.77 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FLTB vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLTB drawdown since its inception was -9.37%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLTB and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLTB | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.37% | -33.37% | +24.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.52% | -4.61% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.52% | -16.13% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.26% | -16.85% | +7.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.37% | -33.37% | +24.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.73% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -3.32% | +1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | 1.87% | -1.51% |
Volatility
FLTB vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF (FLTB) is 0.62%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that FLTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLTB | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 2.69% | -2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.63% | 7.65% | -6.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13% | 10.95% | -8.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.80% | 14.38% | -11.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 16.71% | -13.77% |
FLTB vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLTB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLTB vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
FLTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than SCHD's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTB Fidelity Limited Term Bond ETF | 4.36% | 4.31% | 4.11% | 3.20% | 1.63% | 0.89% | 1.56% | 2.67% | 2.50% | 1.78% | 1.59% | 1.63% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLTB and SCHD have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FLTB (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLTB dropped -9.37% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.79% vs 2.47% for FLTB. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FLTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.79% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLTB.
FLTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 3.24% for SCHD.
FLTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FLTB and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLTB and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer