FLSPX vs. FLMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Meeder Muirfield Fund (FLMFX).
FLSPX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Jan 1, 2015. FLMFX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Aug 9, 1988.
Performance
FLSPX vs. FLMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLSPX vs. FLMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSPX Meeder Spectrum Fund | -1.71% | 16.15% | 27.96% | 14.00% | -11.49% | 20.56% | -0.23% | 13.03% | -3.96% | 19.30% |
FLMFX Meeder Muirfield Fund | -1.70% | 15.28% | 36.53% | 13.79% | -11.16% | 20.18% | 4.36% | 13.52% | -3.65% | 20.30% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLSPX having a -1.71% return and FLMFX slightly higher at -1.70%. Over the past 10 years, FLSPX has underperformed FLMFX with an annualized return of 9.43%, while FLMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.
FLSPX
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
FLMFX
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 0.93%
- 1Y
- 17.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLSPX vs. FLMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLSPX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMFX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLSPX vs. FLMFX — Risk / Return Rank
FLSPX
FLMFX
FLSPX vs. FLMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Meeder Muirfield Fund (FLMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLSPX | FLMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.16 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 1.67 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.24 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 1.84 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 7.31 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLSPX | FLMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.16 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.81 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.76 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.62 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLSPX and FLMFX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FLSPX vs. FLMFX - Dividend Comparison
FLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, less than FLMFX's 5.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSPX Meeder Spectrum Fund | 4.61% | 4.32% | 17.39% | 8.41% | 2.81% | 5.55% | 0.09% | 0.96% | 1.26% | 6.78% | 2.52% | 1.55% |
FLMFX Meeder Muirfield Fund | 5.55% | 5.55% | 31.99% | 2.83% | 2.76% | 3.39% | 0.58% | 2.69% | 1.50% | 8.25% | 0.72% | 2.72% |
Drawdowns
FLSPX vs. FLMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLSPX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum FLMFX drawdown of -42.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSPX and FLMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLSPX | FLMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -42.42% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -9.78% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -18.19% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.07% | -24.33% | -2.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -7.09% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -9.30% | +3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 2.46% | -0.11% |
Volatility
FLSPX vs. FLMFX - Volatility Comparison
Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Meeder Muirfield Fund (FLMFX) have volatilities of 5.41% and 5.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLSPX | FLMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | 5.43% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.71% | 9.63% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.12% | 15.19% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 14.55% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.61% | 14.03% | -0.42% |