FLSP vs. IDVO

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FLSP (Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF) and IDVO (Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while IDVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLSP returned 10.39%/yr vs 22.06%/yr for IDVO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

FLSP vs. IDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSP achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than IDVO's 11.49% return.

FLSP

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.29%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 6M: 4.50%
• 1Y: 14.93%
• 3Y*: 10.39%
• 5Y*: 8.09%
• 10Y*: —

IDVO

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: 11.49%
• 6M: 12.59%
• 1Y: 31.78%
• 3Y*: 22.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSP vs. IDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	2.12%	15.56%	11.75%	3.14%	1.86%
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	11.49%	36.46%	10.16%	17.53%	5.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSP and IDVO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2022	0.05

FLSP vs. IDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FLSP	IDVO
Technology	21.1%	8.7%
Financial Services	18.7%	18.3%
Industrials	14.8%	9.8%
Healthcare	9.7%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	4.2%
Communication Services	6.5%	9.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	7.5%
Basic Materials	5.8%	15.7%
Energy	4.7%	12.1%
Utilities	3.3%	6.4%
Real Estate	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

FLSP vs. IDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSP

FLSP Risk / Return Rank: 60
FLSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FLSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FLSP Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FLSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FLSP Martin Ratio Rank: 65

IDVO

IDVO Risk / Return Rank: 67
IDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
IDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 67
IDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSP vs. IDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) and Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLSP	IDVO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	2.00	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.67	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	3.08	+0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.78	11.84	-1.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLSP vs. IDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the IDVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSP and IDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLSP	IDVO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	2.00	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	1.32	-1.01

Drawdowns

FLSP vs. IDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSP drawdown since its inception was -22.75%, which is greater than IDVO's maximum drawdown of -15.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSP and IDVO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLSP	IDVO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.75%	-15.46%	-7.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.03%	-10.37%	+6.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.69%	-15.46%	+8.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-3.52%	+2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.29%	-2.30%	-3.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.39%	2.69%	-1.30%

Volatility

FLSP vs. IDVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP) is 1.87%, while Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (IDVO) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that FLSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLSP	IDVO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.87%	5.30%	-3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.87%	13.50%	-6.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.29%	16.02%	-6.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.37%	16.43%	-3.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.52%	16.43%	-2.91%

FLSP vs. IDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLSP and IDVO have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

FLSP vs. IDVO - Dividend Comparison

FLSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than IDVO's 5.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF	2.60%	2.65%	1.18%	1.19%	2.18%	1.19%	8.08%
IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF	5.61%	5.42%	6.14%	5.72%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLSP and IDVO in my portfolio?

FLSP and IDVO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLSP or IDVO?

IDVO has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to FLSP (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSP dropped -22.75% vs IDVO's -15.46%.

Which ETF is better, FLSP or IDVO?

On 3-year performance, IDVO leads with 22.06% vs 10.39% for FLSP. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, FLSP has been the lower-risk option at 1.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLSP or IDVO?

Over the 3-year period, IDVO has performed better with a 22.06% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLSP or IDVO?

FLSP and IDVO have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLSP or IDVO?

IDVO has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 2.60% for FLSP.

What is the main difference between FLSP and IDVO?

FLSP is categorized as Long-Short, while IDVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Amplify.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IDVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.