FLRZX vs. IRSQX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FLRZX (Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund) and IRSQX (Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FLRZX returned 8.54%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for IRSQX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLRZX charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for IRSQX.

Performance

FLRZX vs. IRSQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund (FLRZX) and Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRZX achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than IRSQX's 12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FLRZX has underperformed IRSQX with an annualized return of 8.54%, while IRSQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.82% annualized return.

FLRZX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 8.41%
• 1Y: 19.54%
• 3Y*: 14.73%
• 5Y*: 7.08%
• 10Y*: 8.54%

IRSQX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.81%
• YTD: 12.12%
• 6M: 12.80%
• 1Y: 28.63%
• 3Y*: 19.95%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRZX vs. IRSQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLRZX Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund	7.81%	16.43%	11.09%	15.27%	-16.31%	13.26%	11.68%	19.21%	-6.08%	16.98%
IRSQX Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund	12.12%	20.71%	15.32%	20.47%	-18.75%	18.82%	17.28%	25.25%	-9.37%	20.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRZX and IRSQX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.94

The correlation between FLRZX and IRSQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLRZX vs. IRSQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRZX

FLRZX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FLRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FLRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FLRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FLRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FLRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

IRSQX

IRSQX Risk / Return Rank: 79
IRSQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
IRSQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
IRSQX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
IRSQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
IRSQX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRZX vs. IRSQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund (FLRZX) and Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLRZX	IRSQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.55	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.31	3.66	-0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.47	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	3.30	-0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.51	15.92	-3.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLRZX vs. IRSQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the IRSQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRZX and IRSQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLRZX	IRSQX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.55	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.68	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.74	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.73	-0.13

Drawdowns

FLRZX vs. IRSQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRZX drawdown since its inception was -30.74%, smaller than the maximum IRSQX drawdown of -33.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRZX and IRSQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRZX	IRSQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.74%	-33.06%	+2.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-9.42%	+2.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.46%	-15.91%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.74%	-26.14%	-4.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.74%	-33.06%	+2.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-0.79%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.61%	-4.49%	-2.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	1.89%	-0.34%

Volatility

FLRZX vs. IRSQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund (FLRZX) is 2.59%, while Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund (IRSQX) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that FLRZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IRSQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRZX	IRSQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	3.65%	-1.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.86%	9.92%	-3.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.38%	12.20%	-3.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.23%	15.30%	-2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.53%	16.14%	-3.61%

FLRZX vs. IRSQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRZX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than IRSQX's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLRZX vs. IRSQX - Dividend Comparison

FLRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%, less than IRSQX's 14.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRZX Franklin LifeSmart 2030 Retirement Target Fund	5.31%	5.73%	2.70%	2.25%	3.94%	14.55%	2.75%	2.97%	3.79%	2.00%	1.89%	3.03%
IRSQX Voya Target Retirement 2050 Fund	14.21%	15.94%	1.93%	1.89%	6.50%	20.41%	2.18%	4.80%	7.33%	6.29%	1.94%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRZX and IRSQX in my portfolio?

FLRZX and IRSQX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLRZX or IRSQX?

IRSQX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to FLRZX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRZX dropped -30.74% vs IRSQX's -33.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IRSQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.