FLRT vs. SCYB
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB).
FLRT and SCYB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLRT is an actively managed fund by Pacific Life. It was launched on Feb 19, 2015. SCYB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2023.
Performance
FLRT vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLRT vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | -0.24% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 6.98% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | -0.47% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRT achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's -0.47% return.
FLRT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- 5.70%
- 10Y*
- 4.93%
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLRT vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLRT vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
FLRT
SCYB
FLRT vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLRT | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.19 | +0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 1.75 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.28 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.60 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.51 | 8.44 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLRT | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.19 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 1.62 | -0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRT and SCYB is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLRT vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, less than SCYB's 7.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 6.92% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 7.01% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLRT vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRT drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRT and SCYB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRT | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.96% | -4.92% | -16.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.47% | -4.22% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.93% | -1.50% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -0.53% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.80% | -0.17% |
Volatility
FLRT vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) is 0.47%, while Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that FLRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLRT | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 2.25% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.22% | 2.91% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04% | 5.67% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.32% | 5.20% | -2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.24% | 5.20% | +1.04% |