FLRT vs. DADS
FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLRT charges 0.69%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
FLRT vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRT achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 8.09% return.
FLRT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
DADS
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLRT vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 2.10% | 2.59% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 8.09% | -3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRT and DADS is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLRT vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
FLRT
DADS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLRT vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLRT | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLRT vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRT drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRT and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRT | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.96% | -17.07% | -3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -8.12% | +8.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -7.30% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | — | — |
Volatility
FLRT vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLRT | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47% | 17.63% | -16.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.30% | 17.63% | -15.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.11% | 17.63% | -11.52% |
FLRT vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLRT vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than DADS's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 4.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 6.76% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLRT and DADS have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 4.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: Pacific Life and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for FLRT and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for FLRT and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer