FLRT vs. BSJO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) and BSJO (Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. FLRT is actively managed, while BSJO is passively managed. FLRT charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJO.

Performance

FLRT vs. BSJO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FLRT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.55%
• 1Y: 6.08%
• 3Y*: 8.90%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: 5.00%

BSJO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRT vs. BSJO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	1.41%
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

FLRT vs. BSJO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRT vs. BSJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLRT	BSJO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.95	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLRT	BSJO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	—	—

Drawdowns

FLRT vs. BSJO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRT drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, which is greater than BSJO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRT and BSJO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRT	BSJO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.96%	0.00%	-20.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	0.00%	-0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	0.00%	-1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FLRT	BSJO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57%	0.00%	+1.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.30%	0.00%	+2.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.17%	0.00%	+6.17%

FLRT vs. BSJO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRT has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJO's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLRT vs. BSJO - Dividend Comparison

FLRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, while BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSJO Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	6.81%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FLRT or BSJO?

On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLRT or BSJO?

BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for FLRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLRT or BSJO?

FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.

What is the main difference between FLRT and BSJO?

They also come from different issuers: Pacific Life and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for FLRT and 0.42% for BSJO.