FLRHX vs. PADLX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FLRHX (Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund) and PADLX (Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FLRHX returned 8.06%/yr vs 4.00%/yr for PADLX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FLRHX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for PADLX.

Performance

FLRHX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRHX achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.79% return.

FLRHX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 8.84%
• 6M: 9.55%
• 1Y: 21.74%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 8.06%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

PADLX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 13.77%
• 3Y*: 10.39%
• 5Y*: 4.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLRHX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FLRHX Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund	8.84%	17.87%	12.52%	16.53%	-16.51%	14.44%	13.08%
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund	4.79%	10.83%	8.34%	11.01%	-12.54%	2.93%	7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FLRHX and PADLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020	0.85

The correlation between FLRHX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FLRHX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRHX

FLRHX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FLRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FLRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FLRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FLRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FLRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

PADLX

PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 87
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRHX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLRHX	PADLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.97	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	4.41	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.59	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	3.72	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.64	16.26	-3.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLRHX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRHX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLRHX	PADLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.97	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.60	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.65	-0.03

Drawdowns

FLRHX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRHX drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRHX and PADLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLRHX	PADLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.23%	-18.87%	-14.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.64%	-3.63%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.86%	-6.63%	-5.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.23%	-18.87%	-14.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-0.09%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-4.83%	-2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	0.83%	+0.88%

Volatility

FLRHX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund (FLRHX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.51%. This indicates that FLRHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLRHX	PADLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	1.51%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.59%	3.64%	+3.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.33%	4.56%	+4.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.11%	6.65%	+8.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	7.51%	+6.39%

FLRHX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRHX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FLRHX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

FLRHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than PADLX's 4.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRHX Franklin LifeSmart 2035 Retirement Target Fund	6.85%	7.46%	3.01%	2.83%	4.09%	18.13%	3.89%	3.94%	6.43%	2.24%	2.54%	5.76%
PADLX Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund	4.94%	5.03%	3.71%	2.91%	1.01%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLRHX and PADLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FLRHX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FLRHX or PADLX?

FLRHX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to PADLX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRHX dropped -33.23% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.