FLRG vs. USPX
FLRG (Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF) and USPX (Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FLRG tracks the Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index while USPX tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLRG returned 11.92%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for USPX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FLRG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for USPX.
Performance
FLRG vs. USPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than USPX's 9.67% return.
FLRG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.92%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.43%
USPX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 9.67%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $441.29K | $669.16K | $816.00K | |
| $3.15M | $2.94M | $3.73M |
FLRG vs. USPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF | 10.29% | 13.92% | 23.36% | 18.31% | -10.98% | 29.36% | 9.90% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 9.67% | 17.78% | 24.97% | 27.07% | -18.88% | 19.53% | 9.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLRG and USPX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between FLRG and USPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLRG vs. USPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLRG
USPX
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
FLRG
USPX
Financial Services
FLRG
USPX
Consumer Cyclical
FLRG
USPX
Healthcare
FLRG
USPX
Communication Services
FLRG
USPX
Industrials
FLRG
USPX
Consumer Defensive
FLRG
USPX
Energy
FLRG
USPX
Basic Materials
FLRG
USPX
Real Estate
FLRG
USPX
Utilities
FLRG
USPX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLRG vs. USPX — Risk / Return Rank
FLRG
USPX
FLRG vs. USPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLRG | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.04 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | 8.56 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLRG vs. USPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum USPX drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and USPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLRG | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.64% | -31.21% | +11.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.16% | -9.15% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -19.21% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.64% | -24.60% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.63% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -4.40% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.18% | -0.29% |
Volatility
FLRG vs. USPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) is 2.52%, while Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF (USPX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that FLRG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLRG | USPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 3.39% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.18% | 10.23% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 13.02% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.20% | 16.30% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 15.97% | -1.04% |
FLRG vs. USPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLRG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than USPX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLRG vs. USPX - Dividend Comparison
FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than USPX's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRG Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF | 1.37% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.39% | 1.62% | 1.36% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USPX Franklin U.S. Equity Index ETF | 1.09% | 1.07% | 1.23% | 1.35% | 2.21% | 2.40% | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.91% | 2.60% | 4.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FLRG and USPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USPX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to FLRG (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLRG dropped -19.64% vs USPX's -31.21%.
On 5-year performance, FLRG leads with 11.92% vs 11.75% for USPX. On fees, USPX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FLRG has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLRG has performed better with a 11.92% return vs 11.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USPX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLRG.
FLRG has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.09% for USPX.
FLRG tracks Fidelity U.S. Multifactor Index, while USPX tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLRG and 0.03% for USPX.
FLRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLRG and USPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer