PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLRG vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLRG vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLRG vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
-2.67%13.92%23.36%18.31%-10.98%29.36%9.53%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
2.39%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%45.30%28.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLRG achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 2.39% return.


FLRG

1D
2.17%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-3.46%
1Y
12.61%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*

ALTL

1D
0.37%
1M
-5.36%
YTD
2.39%
6M
4.18%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
6.25%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLRG vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLRG has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLRG vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLRG
FLRG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FLRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLRG vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLRGALTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.49

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

2.03

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

2.98

-1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.15

10.34

-4.20

FLRG vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLRG Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLRG and ALTL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLRGALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.49

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.18

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.62

+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between FLRG and ALTL is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLRG vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

FLRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than ALTL's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FLRG
Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.51%1.42%1.42%1.39%1.62%1.36%1.47%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
1.07%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%

Drawdowns

FLRG vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLRG drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLRG and ALTL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLRGALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.64%

-31.91%

+12.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.72%

-9.79%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.64%

-31.91%

+12.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.15%

-5.43%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-11.85%

+8.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.82%

-0.50%

Volatility

FLRG vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity U.S. Multifactor ETF (FLRG) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) at 2.97%. This indicates that FLRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLRGALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

2.97%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

13.20%

-5.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

18.61%

-2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

18.23%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

20.11%

-4.96%