PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOT vs. VPMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLOT vs. VPMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than VPMCX's 20.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FLOT has underperformed VPMCX with an annualized return of 3.06%, while VPMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.88% annualized return.


FLOT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.13%
YTD
2.33%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
3.06%
ALL TIME*
2.30%

VPMCX

1D
-1.07%
1M
-5.99%
6M
15.34%
YTD
20.44%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
23.81%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
16.88%
ALL TIME*
15.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOT vs. VPMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.33%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%1.65%
VPMCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares
20.44%29.60%13.23%28.16%-15.22%21.64%17.16%27.78%-1.99%28.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOT and VPMCX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.11

The correlation between FLOT and VPMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOT vs. VPMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VPMCX
VPMCX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VPMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VPMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOT vs. VPMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLOTVPMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.01

1.42

+1.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.59

3.72

+6.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

97.91

15.43

+82.47

FLOT vs. VPMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOT Sharpe Ratio is 6.11, which is higher than the VPMCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOT and VPMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLOT vs. VPMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum VPMCX drawdown of -50.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and VPMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOTVPMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.54%

-50.45%

+36.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-11.73%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

-20.56%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.36%

-25.25%

+22.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

-32.65%

+19.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.69%

+7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-7.39%

+7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

2.82%

-2.77%

Volatility

FLOT vs. VPMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) is 0.14%, while Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX) has a volatility of 7.08%. This indicates that FLOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOTVPMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

7.08%

-6.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.63%

15.78%

-15.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

18.53%

-17.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.78%

18.72%

-16.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

19.33%

-15.18%

FLOT vs. VPMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VPMCX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLOT vs. VPMCX - Dividend Comparison

FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than VPMCX's 13.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.47%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
VPMCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares
13.58%16.36%6.62%7.16%9.85%10.08%9.74%7.15%8.32%4.53%5.05%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOT and VPMCX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPMCX has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to FLOT (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOT dropped -13.54% vs VPMCX's -50.45%.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.11 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOT and VPMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer