PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOT vs. USHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLOT vs. USHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly higher than USHY's 1.75% return.


FLOT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.23%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
3.04%

USHY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.37%
1Y
7.19%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOT vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.99%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%0.20%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.75%8.81%8.45%12.73%-11.18%5.02%6.17%14.24%-2.41%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOT and USHY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.23

The correlation between FLOT and USHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOT vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

USHY
USHY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
USHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
USHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
USHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
USHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOT vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLOTUSHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+9.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.23

1.36

+1.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.32

2.85

+8.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

105.27

12.77

+92.50

FLOT vs. USHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOT Sharpe Ratio is 6.56, which is higher than the USHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOT and USHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLOT vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, smaller than the maximum USHY drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and USHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOTUSHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.54%

-22.44%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-2.43%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

-4.66%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.36%

-15.56%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-2.66%

+2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.54%

-0.49%

Volatility

FLOT vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) is 0.21%, while iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that FLOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOTUSHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

1.20%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.63%

2.96%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

3.69%

-2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.77%

7.35%

-5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

8.24%

-4.09%

FLOT vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLOT and USHY have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLOT vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison

FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than USHY's 6.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.53%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
USHY
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.90%6.79%6.89%6.63%6.08%5.07%5.30%5.92%6.30%0.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOT and USHY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USHY has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to FLOT (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOT dropped -13.54% vs USHY's -22.44%.

On 5-year performance, FLOT leads with 4.22% vs 4.21% for USHY. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 4.22% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLOT and USHY have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

USHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.90%, compared with 4.53% for FLOT.

FLOT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while USHY is High Yield Bonds. FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, while USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOT and USHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer