PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLOT vs. TRSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLOT vs. TRSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF (TRSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLOT achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than TRSY's 1.63% return.


FLOT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.31%
YTD
2.01%
6M
2.15%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
3.04%

TRSY

1D
0.03%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.75%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLOT vs. TRSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
2.01%4.91%1.33%
TRSY
Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF
1.63%4.22%1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FLOT and TRSY is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLOT vs. TRSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

TRSY
TRSY Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TRSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSY Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLOT vs. TRSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) and Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF (TRSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLOTTRSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-14.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.11

6.18

-3.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.03

59.08

-48.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

102.10

356.66

-254.56

FLOT vs. TRSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLOT Sharpe Ratio is 6.36, which is lower than the TRSY Sharpe Ratio of 10.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLOT and TRSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLOT vs. TRSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLOT drawdown since its inception was -13.54%, which is greater than TRSY's maximum drawdown of -0.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOT and TRSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLOTTRSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.54%

-0.82%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-0.07%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.02%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.06%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

0.01%

+0.04%

Volatility

FLOT vs. TRSY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) has a higher volatility of 0.21% compared to Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF (TRSY) at 0.12%. This indicates that FLOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLOTTRSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

0.12%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.63%

0.24%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

0.39%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.78%

1.10%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

1.10%

+3.05%

FLOT vs. TRSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLOT has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TRSY's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLOT vs. TRSY - Dividend Comparison

FLOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than TRSY's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.53%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%
TRSY
Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF
3.72%4.00%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLOT and TRSY have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLOT has higher volatility (0.21%) compared to TRSY (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLOT dropped -13.54% vs TRSY's -0.82%.

On 1-year performance, FLOT leads with 4.74% vs 3.90% for TRSY. On fees, TRSY is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FLOT has performed better with a 4.74% return vs 3.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TRSY is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FLOT.

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 3.72% for TRSY.

FLOT is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TRSY is Government Bonds. FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index, while TRSY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FLOT and 0.06% for TRSY.

TRSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.13 vs 6.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLOT and TRSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer