FLOA.L vs. SDIA.L
FLOA.L (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SDIA.L (iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - FLOA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD while SDIA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLOA.L returned 4.28%/yr vs 2.40%/yr for SDIA.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FLOA.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SDIA.L.
Performance
FLOA.L vs. SDIA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLOA.L achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than SDIA.L's 0.79% return.
FLOA.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 5.73%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
SDIA.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOA.L vs. SDIA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOA.L iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.04% | 4.98% | 6.42% | 6.62% | 1.35% | 0.42% | 0.86% | 4.17% | 0.86% |
SDIA.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.79% | 6.17% | 4.99% | 5.64% | -4.49% | -0.70% | 4.50% | 6.12% | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLOA.L and SDIA.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLOA.L vs. SDIA.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLOA.L
SDIA.L
FLOA.L vs. SDIA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) and iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLOA.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.07 | 1.45 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.50 | 4.17 | +6.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 55.93 | 16.33 | +39.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLOA.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02 | 2.32 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.16 | 0.92 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
FLOA.L vs. SDIA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLOA.L drawdown since its inception was -14.96%, which is greater than SDIA.L's maximum drawdown of -12.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLOA.L and SDIA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLOA.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.96% | -12.55% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.48% | -1.02% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.74% | -1.32% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.53% | -7.61% | +5.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.03% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -1.17% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.09% | 0.26% | -0.17% |
Volatility
FLOA.L vs. SDIA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) is 0.49%, while iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that FLOA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDIA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLOA.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 0.83% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.13% | 1.51% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 1.84% | -0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 2.62% | -0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 3.44% | +0.83% |
FLOA.L vs. SDIA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLOA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SDIA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLOA.L vs. SDIA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither FLOA.L nor SDIA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
FLOA.L and SDIA.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SDIA.L.
FLOA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while SDIA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for FLOA.L and 0.20% for SDIA.L.
Find the right allocation for FLOA.L and SDIA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer