PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L) and JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JRBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FLO5.L is traded in GBp, while JRBU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JRBU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLO5.L achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly higher than JRBU.L's 3.28% return.


FLO5.L

1D
0.22%
1M
2.50%
YTD
4.39%
6M
4.81%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*

JRBU.L

1D
0.76%
1M
3.60%
YTD
3.28%
6M
4.03%
1Y
9.24%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
1.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FLO5.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
4.39%-2.05%8.11%0.76%13.56%1.75%-2.65%0.79%-0.35%
JRBU.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
3.28%0.49%3.98%2.31%-5.58%-0.42%5.50%10.97%-20.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FLO5.L and JRBU.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2018

0.66

The correlation between FLO5.L and JRBU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLO5.L
FLO5.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FLO5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

JRBU.L
JRBU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JRBU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRBU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L) and JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JRBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLO5.LJRBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.99

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

4.91

+0.29

FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLO5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the JRBU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLO5.L and JRBU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLO5.L drawdown since its inception was -14.02%, smaller than the maximum JRBU.L drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLO5.L and JRBU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLO5.LJRBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.02%

-22.42%

+8.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.32%

-4.63%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.46%

-8.72%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.02%

-12.81%

-1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-3.74%

+2.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.67%

-10.24%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.88%

-0.24%

Volatility

FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L) and JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JRBU.L) have volatilities of 1.81% and 1.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLO5.LJRBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

1.76%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.75%

4.64%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.54%

6.18%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.64%

9.06%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.92%

12.40%

-3.48%

FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLO5.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than JRBU.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FLO5.L vs. JRBU.L - Dividend Comparison

FLO5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, while JRBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLO5.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
4.64%5.11%5.98%5.63%1.47%0.59%1.73%3.00%2.16%0.48%
JRBU.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLO5.L and JRBU.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLO5.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLO5.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JRBU.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for FLO5.L and 0.19% for JRBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLO5.L and JRBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer