FLN vs. C300.L
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L).
FLN and C300.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Latin America Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2011. C300.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P China A 300 Index. It was launched on May 5, 2022. Both FLN and C300.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLN vs. C300.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLN vs. C300.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund | 15.41% | 55.05% | -23.10% | 29.68% | 0.47% |
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 2.00% | 33.78% | 14.79% | -11.81% | 1.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLN achieves a 15.41% return, which is significantly higher than C300.L's 2.00% return.
FLN
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 15.41%
- 6M
- 24.91%
- 1Y
- 52.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
C300.L
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- 35.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLN vs. C300.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than C300.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLN vs. C300.L — Risk / Return Rank
FLN
C300.L
FLN vs. C300.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLN | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 1.95 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | 2.48 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 3.51 | +1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.32 | 15.06 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLN | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.95 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.41 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLN and C300.L is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FLN vs. C300.L - Dividend Comparison
FLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while C300.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLN First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund | 3.47% | 3.40% | 6.26% | 4.17% | 5.57% | 4.70% | 1.64% | 1.91% | 3.08% | 10.28% | 1.06% | 2.34% |
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FLN vs. C300.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLN drawdown since its inception was -57.95%, which is greater than C300.L's maximum drawdown of -31.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLN and C300.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLN | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.95% | -31.77% | -26.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -11.35% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.22% | -4.34% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.07% | -14.62% | -4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.34% | +1.32% |
Volatility
FLN vs. C300.L - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX Fund (FLN) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) at 6.07%. This indicates that FLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C300.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLN | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.17% | 6.07% | +4.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.25% | 12.09% | +5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.00% | 17.91% | +5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 22.13% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.73% | 22.13% | +5.60% |