FLMX vs. OTGL
FLMX (Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF) and OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) are both Latin America Equities funds - FLMX tracks the FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index while OTGL tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLMX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OTGL.
Performance
FLMX vs. OTGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLMX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than OTGL's 5.36% return.
FLMX
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 33.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- —
OTGL
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLMX vs. OTGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 9.45% | 17.61% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 5.36% | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLMX and OTGL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLMX vs. OTGL — Risk / Return Rank
FLMX
OTGL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLMX vs. OTGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLMX | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLMX vs. OTGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLMX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, which is greater than OTGL's maximum drawdown of -13.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMX and OTGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLMX | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.05% | -13.52% | -36.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -9.20% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -3.31% | -8.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | — | — |
Volatility
FLMX vs. OTGL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLMX | OTGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 19.23% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 19.23% | +2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 19.23% | +5.44% |
FLMX vs. OTGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLMX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than OTGL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FLMX vs. OTGL - Dividend Comparison
FLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than OTGL's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 1.89% | 3.99% | 3.31% | 2.90% | 4.22% | 3.15% | 1.48% | 2.95% | 2.51% | 0.31% |
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF | 2.83% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLMX and OTGL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLMX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLMX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.
OTGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 1.89% for FLMX.
FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index, while OTGL tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and OTG. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLMX and 0.95% for OTGL.
Find the right allocation for FLMX and OTGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer