FLMX vs. EWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM).
FLMX and EWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLMX is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2017. EWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Malaysia Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. Both FLMX and EWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FLMX vs. EWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FLMX vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 8.47% | 53.62% | -28.45% | 39.35% | 2.40% | 19.58% | -3.50% | 12.13% | -13.32% | -0.92% |
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.84% | 15.74% | 19.46% | -3.61% | -6.00% | -7.40% | 3.12% | -1.41% | -6.28% | 7.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLMX achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than EWM's 3.84% return.
FLMX
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -7.43%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 53.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.25%
- 10Y*
- —
EWM
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 27.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- 1.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLMX vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLMX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FLMX vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank
FLMX
EWM
FLMX vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FLMX | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 1.76 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.85 | 2.41 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.32 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 3.10 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | 11.53 | +2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FLMX | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.76 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.37 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.07 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between FLMX and EWM is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FLMX vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison
FLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than EWM's 3.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 3.68% | 3.99% | 3.31% | 2.90% | 4.22% | 3.15% | 1.48% | 2.95% | 2.51% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.29% | 3.41% | 3.32% | 3.47% | 3.00% | 6.48% | 1.89% | 2.91% | 3.84% | 5.58% | 5.97% | 37.54% |
Drawdowns
FLMX vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLMX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMX and EWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLMX | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.05% | -89.19% | +39.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.18% | -9.09% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | -23.84% | -7.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.80% | -8.24% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.21% | -31.98% | +19.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 2.44% | +1.25% |
Volatility
FLMX vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) has a higher volatility of 11.48% compared to iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) at 5.96%. This indicates that FLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FLMX | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.48% | 5.96% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.31% | 10.29% | +7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.37% | 15.87% | +8.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 13.62% | +8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.76% | 16.36% | +8.40% |