FLMX vs. DIVI
FLMX (Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF) and DIVI (Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLMX is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index, while DIVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FLMX returned 12.58%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for DIVI. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FLMX charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for DIVI.
Performance
FLMX vs. DIVI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLMX achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than DIVI's 10.71% return.
FLMX
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 33.21%
- 3Y*
- 10.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.58%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVI
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 10.37%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
FLMX vs. DIVI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 9.45% | 53.62% | -28.45% | 39.35% | 2.40% | 19.58% | -3.50% | 12.13% | -13.32% | -0.96% |
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 10.71% | 34.86% | 1.77% | 18.97% | -1.21% | 16.95% | 1.29% | 22.98% | -6.73% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FLMX and DIVI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FLMX and DIVI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
FLMX vs. DIVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FLMX
DIVI
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
FLMX
DIVI
Basic Materials
FLMX
DIVI
Financial Services
FLMX
DIVI
Industrials
FLMX
DIVI
Communication Services
FLMX
DIVI
Real Estate
FLMX
DIVI
Consumer Cyclical
FLMX
DIVI
Energy
FLMX
-
DIVI
Healthcare
FLMX
-
DIVI
Technology
FLMX
-
DIVI
Utilities
FLMX
-
DIVI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FLMX vs. DIVI — Risk / Return Rank
FLMX
DIVI
FLMX vs. DIVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) and Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FLMX | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.56 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 9.86 | -1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FLMX vs. DIVI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLMX drawdown since its inception was -50.05%, which is greater than DIVI's maximum drawdown of -27.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMX and DIVI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FLMX | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.05% | -27.76% | -22.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.18% | -10.54% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.72% | -14.58% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | -18.53% | -13.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.97% | -2.01% | -4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -3.62% | -8.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 2.73% | +1.35% |
Volatility
FLMX vs. DIVI - Volatility Comparison
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIVI) at 5.19%. This indicates that FLMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FLMX | DIVI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 5.19% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 12.95% | +5.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 15.34% | +6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 15.43% | +6.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 16.36% | +8.31% |
FLMX vs. DIVI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLMX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVI's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FLMX vs. DIVI - Dividend Comparison
FLMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than DIVI's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVI Franklin International Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF | 2.05% | 3.76% | 4.39% | 3.17% | 6.03% | 2.77% | 8.04% | 1.61% | 5.67% | 5.22% | 11.56% |
FLMX Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | 1.89% | 3.99% | 3.31% | 2.90% | 4.22% | 3.15% | 1.48% | 2.95% | 2.51% | 0.31% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FLMX and DIVI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLMX has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to DIVI (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMX dropped -50.05% vs DIVI's -27.76%.
On 5-year performance, DIVI leads with 13.30% vs 12.58% for FLMX. On fees, DIVI is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DIVI has been the lower-risk option at 5.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVI has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 12.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVI is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLMX.
DIVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.89% for FLMX.
FLMX is categorized as Latin America Equities, while DIVI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FLMX tracks FTSE Mexico RIC Capped Index, while DIVI tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLMX and 0.09% for DIVI.
DIVI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FLMX and DIVI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer