PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLMVX vs. OLGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLMVX vs. OLGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (OLGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FLMVX having a 7.40% return and OLGAX slightly higher at 7.74%. Over the past 10 years, FLMVX has underperformed OLGAX with an annualized return of 10.20%, while OLGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.58% annualized return.


FLMVX

1D
0.62%
1M
0.82%
YTD
7.40%
6M
7.73%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
10.20%

OLGAX

1D
0.66%
1M
6.67%
YTD
7.74%
6M
6.37%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
19.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLMVX vs. OLGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
7.40%5.17%27.75%11.38%-8.11%29.89%0.36%26.67%-11.66%13.67%
OLGAX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
7.74%13.79%34.85%34.28%-25.58%17.87%55.60%38.81%0.23%37.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMVX and OLGAX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 1997

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FLMVX and OLGAX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLMVX vs. OLGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLMVX
FLMVX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FLMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

OLGAX
OLGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
OLGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
OLGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLMVX vs. OLGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (OLGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLMVXOLGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.29

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

3.66

+3.43

FLMVX vs. OLGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the OLGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMVX and OLGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLMVXOLGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.67

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.91

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.50

+0.12

Drawdowns

FLMVX vs. OLGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMVX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum OLGAX drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMVX and OLGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMVXOLGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.72%

-63.25%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-16.92%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.91%

-21.55%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.59%

-31.34%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.06%

-31.87%

-11.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

0.00%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-18.70%

+12.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

5.94%

-3.81%

Volatility

FLMVX vs. OLGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) is 2.70%, while JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (OLGAX) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that FLMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OLGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMVXOLGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

3.87%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

11.22%

-2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.99%

15.60%

-3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.36%

20.18%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

21.58%

-1.14%

FLMVX vs. OLGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than OLGAX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLMVX vs. OLGAX - Dividend Comparison

FLMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.70%, more than OLGAX's 10.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
19.70%21.16%23.25%6.10%11.73%14.98%7.73%5.20%8.30%2.71%7.04%6.69%
OLGAX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
10.97%11.82%2.06%0.00%3.20%15.30%5.32%13.03%16.18%14.92%9.94%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLMVX and OLGAX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OLGAX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to FLMVX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMVX dropped -54.72% vs OLGAX's -63.25%.

OLGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLMVX and OLGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer