PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLMVX vs. JMSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLMVX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLMVX achieves a 14.54% return, which is significantly higher than JMSIX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FLMVX has outperformed JMSIX with an annualized return of 10.61%, while JMSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.77% annualized return.


FLMVX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.15%
6M
9.83%
YTD
14.54%
1Y
17.92%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
11.98%

JMSIX

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.35%
6M
0.86%
YTD
1.24%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
6.89%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
3.77%
ALL TIME*
2.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FLMVX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
14.54%5.17%27.75%11.38%-8.11%29.89%0.36%26.67%-11.66%13.67%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund Class I
1.24%7.68%7.78%6.14%-8.24%3.59%3.07%11.82%1.03%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FLMVX and JMSIX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014

0.21

The correlation between FLMVX and JMSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (10 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLMVX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLMVX
FLMVX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FLMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

JMSIX
JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLMVX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLMVXJMSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.42

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

9.60

-0.25

FLMVX vs. JMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the JMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLMVX and JMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLMVX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLMVX drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, which is greater than JMSIX's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLMVX and JMSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLMVXJMSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.72%

-18.40%

-36.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.19%

-1.62%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.91%

-2.25%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.59%

-11.39%

-14.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.06%

-18.40%

-24.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.47%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.42%

-2.53%

-3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

0.41%

+1.66%

Volatility

FLMVX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX) at 0.55%. This indicates that FLMVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLMVXJMSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

0.55%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

1.88%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

2.44%

+9.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

3.74%

+15.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.40%

3.86%

+16.54%

FLMVX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLMVX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLMVX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison

FLMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.48%, more than JMSIX's 5.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
18.48%21.16%23.25%6.10%11.73%14.98%7.73%5.20%8.30%2.71%7.04%6.69%
JMSIX
JPMorgan Income Fund Class I
5.54%5.95%5.78%4.43%4.78%4.00%4.95%5.10%5.43%5.42%0.46%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLMVX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLMVX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to JMSIX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLMVX dropped -54.72% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.

JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLMVX and JMSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer