PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLLV vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLLV vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FLLV

1D
0.47%
1M
0.96%
6M
8.29%
YTD
14.91%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.06%

SPMV

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$621.36K$657.47K$945.62K

FLLV vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
14.91%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%9.61%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FLLV and SPMV is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FLLV and SPMV has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FLLV vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FLLV
SPMV

Technology

28.8%
26.9%

Financial Services

13.0%
17.8%

Healthcare

11.6%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
6.6%

Industrials

9.6%
6.0%

Communication Services

7.8%
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
10.7%

Energy

4.4%
4.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
2.6%

Utilities

2.6%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.5%
0.2%

Technology

FLLV
28.8%
SPMV
26.9%

Financial Services

FLLV
13.0%
SPMV
17.8%

Healthcare

FLLV
11.6%
SPMV
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FLLV
11.0%
SPMV
6.6%

Industrials

FLLV
9.6%
SPMV
6.0%

Communication Services

FLLV
7.8%
SPMV
6.5%

Consumer Defensive

FLLV
6.1%
SPMV
10.7%

Energy

FLLV
4.4%
SPMV
4.8%

Basic Materials

FLLV
2.7%
SPMV
2.6%

Utilities

FLLV
2.6%
SPMV
2.8%

Real Estate

FLLV
2.5%
SPMV
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLLV vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLLV
FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLLV vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLLVSPMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.20

FLLV vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLLV vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLLVSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

Volatility

FLLV vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLLVSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

FLLV vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLLV has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLLV vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

FLLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, while SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
4.84%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.05%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLLV and SPMV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.84%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.

FLLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while SPMV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FLLV and 0.10% for SPMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLLV and SPMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer