FLLA vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FLLA (Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLLA is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FLLA returned 41.47% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.28 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FLLA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

FLLA vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLLA achieves a 16.42% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.

FLLA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 4.57%
• 6M: 1.61%
• YTD: 16.42%
• 1Y: 41.47%
• 3Y*: 11.67%
• 5Y*: 9.94%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.72%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 32.41%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 1Y: 98.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -42.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF	$649.19K	$662.69K	$1.07M
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$29.57M	$32.71M	$46.48M

FLLA vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF	16.42%	51.81%	-22.77%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	39.44%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FLLA and SBIT is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.28

Return for Risk

FLLA vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLLA

FLLA Risk / Return Rank: 77
FLLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FLLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FLLA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FLLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FLLA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLLA vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLLA	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.27	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	1.95	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.23	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	2.35	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.38	5.19	+2.19

FLLA vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLLA Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLLA and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLLA vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLLA drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLLA and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLLA	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.88%	-91.35%	+37.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.75%	-47.94%	+34.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.96%	-77.87%	+69.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.42%	-69.07%	+55.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.66%	21.67%	-16.01%

Volatility

FLLA vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF (FLLA) is 4.91%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that FLLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLLA	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.91%	18.09%	-13.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.61%	67.10%	-49.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.63%	88.65%	-67.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.66%	96.10%	-73.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.36%	96.10%	-68.74%

FLLA vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLLA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLLA vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

FLLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FLLA Franklin FTSE Latin America ETF	4.71%	6.06%	7.04%	5.45%	9.55%	7.60%	2.12%	3.18%	0.48%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.03%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLLA and SBIT in my portfolio?

FLLA and SBIT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLLA or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to FLLA (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLLA dropped -53.88% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, FLLA or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 41.47% for FLLA. On fees, FLLA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLLA has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLLA or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 41.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLLA or SBIT?

FLLA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLLA or SBIT?

FLLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between FLLA and SBIT?

FLLA is categorized as Latin America Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. FLLA tracks FTSE Latin America RIC Capped Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FLLA and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.