FLJP vs. PBDC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) and PBDC (Putnam BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FLJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while PBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. FLJP is passively managed, while PBDC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FLJP returned 18.78%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for PBDC. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FLJP charges 0.09%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for PBDC.

Performance

FLJP vs. PBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 17.39% return, which is significantly higher than PBDC's -5.24% return.

FLJP

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: 9.36%
• YTD: 17.39%
• 1Y: 30.13%
• 3Y*: 18.78%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.97%

PBDC

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: 3.30%
• 6M: 0.44%
• YTD: -5.24%
• 1Y: -8.42%
• 3Y*: 6.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	$34.02M	$41.70M	$42.19M
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF	$3.01M	$3.13M	$3.68M

FLJP vs. PBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	17.39%	26.79%	6.99%	20.00%	10.96%
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF	-5.24%	-1.77%	19.43%	30.52%	10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and PBDC is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022	0.38

Return for Risk

FLJP vs. PBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLJP

FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 56
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 57

PBDC

PBDC Risk / Return Rank: 5
PBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLJP vs. PBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLJP	PBDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	-0.44	+1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	-0.51	+2.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.94	+0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.28	-0.48	+2.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.58	-0.81	+8.39

FLJP vs. PBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the PBDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and PBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. PBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, which is greater than PBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and PBDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJP	PBDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-20.47%	-12.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	-17.71%	+4.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.17%	-20.47%	+6.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-13.08%	+11.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.25%	-5.17%	-4.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.98%	10.37%	-6.39%

Volatility

FLJP vs. PBDC - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a higher volatility of 7.08% compared to Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) at 5.30%. This indicates that FLJP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJP	PBDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	5.30%	+1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.01%	15.38%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.09%	19.11%	+0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.13%	17.06%	+1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.94%	17.06%	+0.88%

FLJP vs. PBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDC's 13.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLJP vs. PBDC - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than PBDC's 11.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	4.19%	5.15%	4.56%	3.00%	1.92%	2.40%	1.51%	2.26%	1.50%	0.10%
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF	11.09%	10.53%	9.29%	9.86%	3.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLJP and PBDC in my portfolio?

FLJP and PBDC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLJP or PBDC?

FLJP has higher volatility (7.08%) compared to PBDC (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs PBDC's -20.47%.

Which ETF is better, FLJP or PBDC?

On 3-year performance, FLJP leads with 18.78% vs 6.10% for PBDC. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PBDC has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FLJP or PBDC?

Over the 3-year period, FLJP has performed better with a 18.78% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FLJP or PBDC?

FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 13.49% for PBDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FLJP or PBDC?

PBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.09%, compared with 4.19% for FLJP.

What is the main difference between FLJP and PBDC?

FLJP is categorized as Japan Equities, while PBDC is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 13.49% for PBDC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.