PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLJP vs. OPPJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLJP vs. OPPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly lower than OPPJ's 26.34% return.


FLJP

1D
-4.00%
1M
1.04%
YTD
15.09%
6M
14.43%
1Y
33.85%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*

OPPJ

1D
-4.11%
1M
0.60%
YTD
26.34%
6M
27.22%
1Y
63.54%
3Y*
34.64%
5Y*
25.28%
10Y*
18.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJP vs. OPPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
15.09%26.79%6.99%20.00%-16.57%0.99%15.76%18.99%-14.01%2.53%
OPPJ
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF
26.34%37.08%20.70%38.96%5.02%11.66%-3.22%18.24%-18.69%2.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and OPPJ is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.72

The correlation between FLJP and OPPJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (5 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLJP vs. OPPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

OPPJ
OPPJ Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
OPPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
OPPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJP vs. OPPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FLJPOPPJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.51

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

6.50

-3.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

21.87

-13.00

FLJP vs. OPPJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the OPPJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and OPPJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. OPPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum OPPJ drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and OPPJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLJPOPPJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.49%

-39.30%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.30%

-9.82%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-16.49%

+2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-16.49%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-4.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-6.48%

-2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

2.92%

+0.91%

Volatility

FLJP vs. OPPJ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF (OPPJ) have volatilities of 7.16% and 7.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLJPOPPJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

7.39%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

16.54%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.84%

20.67%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.95%

18.25%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.88%

19.59%

-1.71%

FLJP vs. OPPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than OPPJ's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLJP vs. OPPJ - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, more than OPPJ's 1.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
3.83%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%0.00%0.00%
OPPJ
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF
1.50%1.78%4.02%2.71%2.63%2.96%3.04%2.17%2.06%1.53%1.66%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLJP and OPPJ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPPJ has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to FLJP (7.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLJP dropped -32.49% vs OPPJ's -39.30%.

On 5-year performance, OPPJ leads with 25.28% vs 9.15% for FLJP. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJP has been the lower-risk option at 7.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OPPJ has performed better with a 25.28% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OPPJ.

FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 1.50% for OPPJ.

FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index, while OPPJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for FLJP and 0.58% for OPPJ.

OPPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLJP and OPPJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer