FLJP vs. IDMO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO).

FLJP and IDMO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLJP is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. IDMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2012. Both FLJP and IDMO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FLJP vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FLJP vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	7.49%	26.79%	6.99%	20.00%	-16.57%	0.99%	15.76%	18.99%	-14.01%	2.22%
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	1.97%	42.17%	12.79%	20.16%	-12.03%	14.31%	22.01%	26.09%	-16.66%	2.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLJP achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 1.97% return.

FLJP

• 1D: 2.35%
• 1M: -4.22%
• YTD: 7.49%
• 6M: 11.85%
• 1Y: 33.62%
• 3Y*: 17.62%
• 5Y*: 7.52%
• 10Y*: —

IDMO

• 1D: 2.81%
• 1M: -4.19%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 7.03%
• 1Y: 31.67%
• 3Y*: 23.75%
• 5Y*: 14.52%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLJP vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLJP has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IDMO

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF

FLJP

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

Return for Risk

FLJP vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLJP

FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 81
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 81

IDMO

IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 85
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLJP vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FLJP	IDMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.66	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.28	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.35	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	2.66	-0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.31	10.75	-1.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FLJP vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLJP Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLJP and IDMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FLJP	IDMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	1.66	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.83	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.44	-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between FLJP and IDMO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FLJP vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than IDMO's 3.73% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF	4.79%	5.15%	4.56%	3.00%	1.92%	2.40%	1.51%	2.26%	1.50%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	3.73%	3.71%	2.24%	2.89%	3.66%	1.81%	1.63%	2.78%	3.27%	3.08%	2.18%	2.52%

Drawdowns

FLJP vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLJP drawdown since its inception was -32.49%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLJP and IDMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLJP	IDMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.49%	-39.38%	+6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.30%	-12.31%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-27.07%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.59%	-6.22%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-9.85%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	3.05%	+0.45%

Volatility

FLJP vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) have volatilities of 8.84% and 9.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLJP	IDMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.84%	9.12%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.51%	12.67%	+1.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.28%	19.21%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	17.67%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.77%	17.90%	-0.13%